This pianist has no forte

After a slew of Russian-school pianists who bang like road hammers and pedal faster than Lance Armstrong,  it’s a huge relief to come across a keyboard artist who treats the modern piano like Meissen china.

His latest  release is my Album of the Week on Click here.

porcelain piano

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
  • Mr.Leberecht’s usual russiophobic comments aside:Why should I want to listento a pianist with a limited dynamic range?If so,there’s always Richard Clayderman.

  • Delighted to learn about this artist, and his utilizing a sound and touch akin to, as close, to, the original sound world of these compositions. I will seek this out to have a listen to what you share here. Personally, I had the opportunity to play on vintage, restored instruments which include these classical era keyboards, and enjoyed the differences in their construction, touch and sound. I often tell my students to be very careful with their conception of dynamics through the centuries. What was a ‘forte’ sound in 1808 is quite different from a ‘forte’ sound in 2015. Much of this has to do with the room size and instrument being used for the recording, of course.

  • Running risk of being declared russiophobic one does come away from the russian
    school of piano playing wondering if such a notation as p …is in their teaching , I do
    note that a double p causes them to panic and a triple p to invite heart failure . Mr. Fray
    is an interesting player but must be cautious not to turn this into a schtick . Mr. Lebrecht
    might also find Piotr Anderszewski a less mannered pianist worth hearing .

  • You would prefer Liberace to Richter, Gilels, Sofronitsky, Sokolov, Yudina, Lugansky, Heinrich Neuhaus, Stanislav Neuhaus, Yovanovitch, Pletnev, Horowitz, etc. etc.
    [redacted: abuse]

  • >