The funkier side of Benjamin Britten
mainHoliday improv from our pals at Raw Creation.
You see it here first.
Holiday improv from our pals at Raw Creation.
You see it here first.
The Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra have uploaded one…
The orchestra of Spain’s poorest region has just…
There has long been a theory that the…
The Vienna State Opera has posted a death…
Session expired
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
all I can say say “Why?”
what’s the point of adding all those pointless syncopations to Britten’s music? Does it in any way, shape, or form, improve on the original?
to me, this is the same as when rock groups or jazz musicians try to play classical pieces.
I’m sorry to say that I don’t really see the point of this. Why take a very fine arrangement of one of the most beautiful of British folk songs and do this with it? It’s not that I think that Britten’s arrangement is sacrosanct; I just don’t see what is gained by adapting it in this way.
This is an English folksong, and there are umpteen arrangements of it! But that figure in the right hand of going up a tone all over the place just gets plain boring!
The relative bareness of the Britten arrangement is what makes it so striking. The additional line material clogs it up….rather un-funky to my mind.
This twist on Ferneyhough on the other hand is rather fun as I thunk it’s done with an element of affection : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ScxXYjgf3PU