This composer burns her pianos

From Yale News:

Many composers are known for writing music on pianos. Composer Annea Lockwood is better known for burning them.

On Wednesday afternoon, Lockwood shared insights about her compositional process with students in Department of Music visiting lecturer Kerry O’Brien’s experimental music seminar, “American Experimental Music in the Long 1960s.” Throughout the semester, students study six collections of experimental music, concluding with the collection “Women’s Work,” co-edited by Lockwood and featuring the piece “Piano Burning.”

“It’s a rare opportunity to have a dialogue about this history with someone so plugged into this scene,” O’Brien said.

More here.

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
  • An expression of female rage about male dominance of the avantgarde field? Disappointed about her piano lessons? Attempt at a new tuning system? Populist attack upon a symbol of civilization, or anti-European gesture? Or resulting from a failed attempt to play Scriabine’s “Vers la flamme”?

    • In his ‘experimental period’, JB tried this out with his Blüthner Grand, but then he found-out he could do it only once.

      I for my part greatly appreciate this work of concept art. There are a couple of instruments here which would find a warm welcome in this season if played in this way.


          • Nope, Schumann owned a Streicher which Brahms ended up with, it had no metal frame either but had a bigger compass than the 95 Broadwood. Metal frames came in about 1850 from US, before that they were limited by the wood bracing many collapsed under Liszt’s antics, LVBs was knackered a year after he received it as he did not ask the Broadwood tuner back again.

  • It could have been another woman who burns pianos, but I remember seeing something on TV about this maybe 3 years ago. I wonder if it has occurred to her that this spectacle will always be what she is known for, and if so does it bother her?

  • In former, slightly less insane times, such things would never be considered art, let alone music. Since the boundaries of art and music have been extended to include the truly, wholeheartedly crazy, as to be more fair to the talent-challenged, it can now count as an ‘artistic deed’ and draw an audience, maybe even funding, and the ‘maker’ can parade as an ‘artist’. People protesting that it is nonsense, can then be labelled as ‘conservatives’ who ‘don’t understand’ and ‘are not of their times’. The ‘provocation’ is not the deed itself which is merely idiotic, but the assumption that understanding is required to avoid being conservative and outdated.

    How long will people be fooled by such juvenile nonsense?

    • Indeed. The book burning in the thirties was motivated by irrational hatred, the burning and destruction of musical instruments within the context of ‘modern music’ has comparable motivations but is disguised as ‘art’. Both endeavors are practiced by people with ambitions but without talents, and were helped by the nonsense of John Cage who provided the manuals. His ideas opened the doors to the empty-heads who finally saw an opportunity to sport their deficiencies as assets.

  • >