A conductor writes: ‘I have dealt with a lot of aggressive, entitled men ‘

A conductor writes: ‘I have dealt with a lot of aggressive, entitled men ‘

News

norman lebrecht

May 01, 2024

The conductor Rebecca Bryant Novak is a doctoral student at Eastman School of Music. She’s having a tough time complaining about a particular faculty member.

Here are some of the issues:

I’ve never been sexually assaulted, but I have dealt with a lot of aggressive, entitled men in this field and the institutions that protect them – most recently at the Eastman School of Music.

It’s impossible, in situations like these, to know how much to share and how much not to, especially in a forum as wide-open as the internet. Over-sharing can feel irresponsible. So can under-sharing. It leaves an awful lot to the imagination.

The ambiguity of that decision is one reason, among many, that so many people in problem situations say nothing. I’m not going to do that. Saying nothing can be the most irresponsible thing of all. But one of many, many costs of going through a situation like this is agonizing over the balance between saying too much and not saying enough.

I’m a doctoral student in orchestral conducting at Eastman – one of very, very few women admitted to the program in its history. Six weeks into my first semester, I had to report a long list of concerns about a faculty member.

Some of it was hostile, unprofessional behavior and some troubling comments – toward and about other students. Some of the hostility was directed at me, in addition to some gender-based remarks and privacy concerns. By the time I raised concerns, the situation had become extremely uncomfortable. Most of it was clearly documented. And the problems weren’t new. He said he’d gotten “a slap on the wrist” for bad behavior in the past.

The school was well aware of ongoing issues. I took a long report to the appropriate member of Eastman’s leadership. His first advice was that I transfer out of the school all together, because, he said, “I don’t want things to get bad for you.”

I didn’t expect a perfect response, but I was genuinely shocked by the degree – bordering on adulation – to which Eastman protected its faculty – despite clear-cut, chronic issues of behavior and competence. (Badly behaved geniuses are a myth. I’ve never met one – just lots of emperors who have no clothes.)

The first solution I accepted was limiting my contact with the situation. It wasn’t a perfect plan, but it allowed me to get on with my life. When the faculty member objected, Eastman altered the agreement to suit his wishes. I wasn’t asked – just told that if I didn’t comply, I wouldn’t get my degree – despite the fact that several members of the school’s leadership had expressed concern about our having prolonged contact.

I refused, and told Eastman they were welcome to fail me out of the program. What ensued was an administrative nightmare, and it took three tenured faculty members – all women – taking up the issue on my behalf, and my decision to initiate a university investigation (on issues that were largely documented and not in dispute), to even get a partial resolution.

Even then, I was in an enormously compromised position. I lost opportunities I would have otherwise had and lost the potential for references. I also spent the entire first year of my doctorate in a state of constant stress, discomfort, and distraction.

Other students and faculty members in my department offered little support, despite being aware of the situation. Most didn’t even offer a private word of concern. Some excused and enabled the behavior. It is continually shocking to me that an entire professional culture still treats this kind of thing as normal.

I’m a doctoral student, and I came back to the degree after spending time in the professional field. This was a nearly impossible process for me to manage, and it has taken a huge toll on my work and sanity. If one of Eastman’s many 17- or 18-year-old students took this on, it’s hard to imagine how they could make it through. Mine wasn’t the worst situation imaginable, and it was still hugely damaging.

I’ve said repeatedly, for nearly nine months, that the attitudes Eastman operates on – and models for its students – are irresponsible. The situation I experienced is a direct antecedent to the kind of abuse seen at the New York Philharmonic and so many other places. The degree is different, but the mechanisms are exactly the same.

Students are learning those lessons – of fear, compliance, silence, the normalization of abuse – right here, right now. You don’t have to teach those lessons explicitly. You just have to make it clear who is protected and who is not, and the lessons teach themselves.

Eastman has only doubled down and deflected. I have been repeatedly lectured on the rights and status of its faculty members. I have seen some truly extraordinary mental gymnastics performed on behalf of the man I reported. Because – as Eastman’s Title IX Coordinator told me – “He’s faculty, so we trust his judgment.”

Read on here.

Comments

  • Reality Sux says:

    ‘I’m going to be one of those who say nothing’. No doubt it’s terrible to be having a tough interpersonal and learning experience as a student at any level, especially an elite one at a (formerly) elite school such as Eastman, and I salute anyone who speaks up.

    But this is thin on specifics. What exactly did the wicked faculty member say or do? No details.

    I received a complaint a few semesters ago by an unprepared student preparing for an important performance at our school, who, after our coaching went to the Dean crying, ‘professor X praised the collaborative pianist while criticizing me and I felt so horrible’. Yes, because her rhythm was imprécise and the end of the piece, about a quarter of the whole thing, was not ready at all, with confusion about what fits where and then profusely stopping. My tone was respectful and I described problems dispassionately, but I was clear that this isn’t acceptable considering how close we were to the date, with plenty of advance notice.

    Luckily, the Dean had common sense. But to another person with a penchant for fostering grievances against Opressors, this could have been entitlement by an aggressive man. I’m a white straight male and the student was actually from an underrepresented group… Could have ended differently somewhere else. I’ll bite my lip next time, not worth it.

    • Tom says:

      Notice how she posted her name, but you didn’t. And you implied that this type of abuse is just reality. You poor thing.

    • Gabriel Parra Blessing says:

      Reality Sux, ever watch David Mamet’s “Oleanna”? If not, you should. Sounds like that prescient play and film mirrored your own experience, and I have a hunch a similar dynamic is at play in this young lady’s grievance. If she conducts at all as she writes, little wonder she’s flunking out of the program and manufacturing a complaint to mask her incompetence.

  • ENRIQUE SANCHEZ says:

    Damn – it makes me sick to see the “good ol’ boys” network still in operation. It is revolting to all the senses!

  • John Chunch says:

    Sounds like Eastman is fostering an abusive environment towards brave female conductors. Shame on them!

  • Moenkhaus says:

    Tip of the iceberg…..so much more to come from decades of abuse at orchestras and music schools alike.

  • Batty says:

    I don’t miss my years, as a staff member, in Academia. For every wonderfully gifted, decent, faculty/staff member, there were at least 4 squirrels. Hopefully you’ll get your degree, get out, and leave the entitled one in the rear-view mirror.

  • Long John Silver says:

    Pathetique

  • Alviano says:

    Reality Sux is right. The article is short on specifics. We don’t know anything.
    And remember: there are two sides to every story.

    • John Borstlap says:

      That depends. There are quite some stories which happen to have only one side: burglary, war, terrorism, blocked drains, etc.

  • Parent of Future Student says:

    I can regretably understand for legal reasons why the teachers name is kept secret.
    Could anyone please give clues here or on Reddit who this asshole is?
    Shame is a decent deterant!

    • Y says:

      I would advise you to read the article again… And if you still don’t see it, read it another time… the lack of specifics, the incendiary language, the lack of mention of any official policy/due process that usually gets triggered into action by a formal complaint, not to mention any PADH practices. Across all 9 of her articles to date (05/24/24) all of these elements are present congruently. Makes me doubt the validity of the claim to say the least…

  • Save the MET says:

    Interestingly, Eastman currently has no world beating conductors on their academic staff. Nor does their conducting program have the prestige it once had. I’d leave, all sorts of other coonservatories and programs with more prestigeous faculty elsewhere. The academic year is about over, time for her to move on to a place where she will be happier.

  • Woman conductor says:

    Good for her, speaking up like that. Conservatories are terrible for women. Not every studio, but there are always a few horrible ones and no one ever does anything about them. And yes, the men who do this tend to not actually be “the best.” Especially the conductors.

  • Mango says:

    We all have to deal with entitled aggressive men – whatever our gender etc.and whatever our walk of life. And, oddly, there are aggressive entitled women too! It’s called life!

  • Antwerp Smerle says:

    We tend to think that humankind is able to act dispassionately and objectively when judging its own behaviour. But every day there is more evidence that many organisations are riddled with Neanderthal tribalism. Orchestras, conservatoires, broadcasters, political parties, law enforcement agencies etc etc.

    “He’s Faculty. He’s one of us. He must be OK”.

    “Everybody loves him. He does great work for charity. He couldn’t possibly be a paedophile”.

    Why do we find it so easy to remain in denial?

    • John Borstlap says:

      I’m not sure whether the ‘we’ should be applied with such subjects.

      There are enough normal people around.

  • Miles says:

    I read these smears about ‘aggressive entitled men’ then go on to read there have been ‘troubling comments’ and ‘gender based remarks’. Really?
    If I had cried my eyes out over every catty comment I’ve received from women in my field I’d be very dehydrated by now.
    Fortunately I just didn’t give a sh*t.

  • Elizabeth says:

    A lot of the comments make it very easy to understand exactly what Miss Novak is talking about. She’s complaining about the System in place at Eastman specifically, and throughout the orchestral network in general. Her problematic encounters with the faculty member aren’t the point here. Rather, the lack of appropriate institutional protocols and culture of silence are. Everyone with daughters, friends, sisters, etc. interested in pursuing a musical career should listen and take note.

  • Marlow says:

    She now realises that academia is full of aggressive entitled men – some of us have known that for years – only we would add ‘aggressive entitled women’ to the list.

  • John Winzenburg says:

    This young lady has a lot to learn. As a professional conductor with decades of experience, I’ve seen it all. Becoming a successful conductor is rarely easy. Not everyone is up to the task. They don’t have the discipline or talent it takes to succeed. She needs to ask herself if she’s willing to do the work. I don’t care if you’re a man or a woman. You have to do the work!

  • Conductora Estudiante says:

    Rebecca would have been much better off if she was in Brad Lubman’s studio instead. She would have been a lot more successful. Lubman’s studio has the best students and produces the best conductors. Lubman’s most recent female student turned out to be one of the best young conductors in the world.

  • MOST READ TODAY: