Just in: Cleveland declares no-confidence in chiefs

Just in: Cleveland declares no-confidence in chiefs

News

norman lebrecht

February 29, 2024

Here’s the latest from the horribly troubled Cleveland Institute of Music, where many of the teachers are players in the outstanding Cleveland Orchestra:

The CIM Faculty has voted No Confidence in President Paul Hogle and Provost Scott Harrison.

Regarding Paul Hogle, the vote was 83 to 8 (91% in favor of the resolution of No Confidence).

Regarding Scott Harrison, the vote was 81 to 10 (89% in favor of the resolution of No Confidence).

These results will be sent to Susan Rothmann, Chair of the CIM Board. The resolutions are as follows:

Paul Hogle

WHEREAS CIM faces its most dangerous financial situation in decades, is running its first budget deficit in decades, and faces the difficulty of recruiting students with an uncompetitive discount rate for the foreseeable future;

WHEREAS President Paul Hogle has overseen a debilitating turnover of over 120 members of the staff, including eighteen in Development (including seven Chief Development Officers), eleven in Concerts and Events, ten in the Deans Office, nine in Marketing, and eight in Admissions, as well as unprecedented levels of resignations, causing substantial problems with continuity, institutional knowledge, and competency;

WHEREAS President Hogle appointed Scott Harrison to the position of Provost, who lacks any of the traditional qualifications, credentials, and experience required for the role of Provost to the position, leading to serious mismanagement of the Institute’s academic and artistic affairs, as well as repeated actions in violation of traditional academic standards and norms, as well as CIM and HLC policies;

WHEREAS President Hogle disregarded and/or ignored repeated complaints by students, staff, and faculty about the orchestra situation at CIM during the 2022-23 season, including ignoring the recommendations of the Orchestra 2.0 Task Force, as well as a fall 2022 survey of CIM orchestral musicians which was damning in its result;

WHEREAS President Hogle’s leadership style is ill-suited to an academic environment which relies on consensus-building and compromise in decision-making;

WHEREAS President Hogle accepted a raise of $111,282 (26.3%) between the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years while simultaneously guiding CIM into its first deficit in 30 years and advising faculty that merit-based or cost-of-living raises would not be expected for several years;

WHEREAS morale among faculty and staff is at a level detrimental to the functioning of the institution and advancement of its mission;

WHEREAS the once-great reputation of CIM has been severely diminished at a national and international level;

WHEREAS the aforementioned misdeeds have significantly jeopardized CIM’s ability to pass its 2025 comprehensive HLC accreditation site visit;

WHEREAS CIM is hungry for new, positive leadership which looks to the future and understands the educational challenges – and opportunities – facing the Institute and the young musician of the 21st century in a rapidly changing landscape. CIM needs leadership which will restore morale, inspire the faculty and staff, and renew trust in the Office of the President. CIM needs a leader with the temperament, education, academic experience, and shared values to lead us into our next century;

Therefore, we the Faculty of the Cleveland Institute of Music are expressing a vote of NO CONFIDENCE in Paul Hogle.

Scott Harrison

WHEREAS Scott Harrison was appointed Provost by the President despite lacking the traditional credentials (an earned doctorate degree and extensive academic administrative experience, often as a dean or senior faculty member intimately familiar with the norms and standards of academia and the concept and role of shared governance) required for the role of provost at an institution of higher education;

WHEREAS Provost Harrison has zero prior experience in academic administration and has never served on a university faculty senate, academic committee, or other governing body and has never managed an academic department or college;

WHEREAS his lack of credentials and relevant experience have led Provost Harrison to repeatedly violate norms of shared governance, disregard faculty consultation, and make decisions detrimental to the Institute, including:

– Overseeing alarming faculty/staff turnover due to toxic working conditions, stagnant salaries, and one-year contracts

– Showing a lack of fundamental understanding of basic management of academic areas and ensembles, leading to serious logistical and artistic issues that negatively impact the quality of offerings and well-being of students

– Attempting to unilaterally restructure the faculty in disregard for the role of shared governance and commonly accepted established academic norms and procedures

– Creation and modification of academic programs without the approval of faculty or the Curriculum Committee, as outlined in institution policy

– Refusing transparency in appointing a new Title IX investigator, causing confusion and distrust

– Replacing a unanimously supported department head without proper faculty consultation and against clearly defined policy, as outlined in the Faculty Handbook

– Refusing to follow standards of academic pay and benefits to candidates to join the faculty, resulting in loss of competitive talent to peer institutions

WHEREAS Provost Harrison’s lack of qualifications and actions have compromised CIM’s accreditation standards with the Higher Learning Commission;

WHEREAS the faculty have lost all confidence and trust in Provost Harrison’s ability to fulfill the duties of the position;

Therefore, we the Faculty of the Cleveland Institute of Music are expressing a vote of NO CONFIDENCE in Scott Harrison.

Comments

  • Walter says:

    early last summer on this website, pretty much everyone piled on Hannah, a young independent journalist who is one of only a handful in the U.S. doing actual arts reporting through a critical lens (beyond the press releases) and all of their reporting has been borne out

    • Couperin says:

      What’s your point

    • Carl says:

      Yes, she (and Van) should be credited, just as the cub reporter from the University of Michigan was when a couple faculty there resigned in disgrace. The big newspapers like the Cleveland Plain-Dealer or Detroit News apparently have other fish to fry these days.

  • Robin says:

    So sad to read so much on this site about all of the upheaval at the Cleveland Institute of Music. This is/was one of the best schools of music in the United States. It doesn’t need all of this bad press-CIM’s success depends on donors support, as we all know. Hopefully they can fix the issues internally and there aren’t articles “every day” about it.

    • Tiredofitall says:

      Sunlight is the best disinfectant…always. CIM has primary responsibility to the students. Everything else will follow.

    • Elizabeth says:

      What a strange comment, Robin. Perhaps you also think the biggest problem the Titanic faced was bad press? Every student preparing for college admissions and every educator doing job searches deserves to make informed decisions.

      • Robin says:

        Elizabeth – I just think the countless articles and comments on here are not helping them focus on fixing the problem(s). And no, I don’t think the TITANIC (very strange analogy)’s worst problem was bad press. Are you from the states? Do you realize how much these institutions depend on donors’ dollars? Have a nice day.

        • Tiredofitall says:

          I am from the States. Trust is most important in philanthropy, which is why states attorneys general monitor non-profits.
          Donors demand and deserve unvarnished truth, not obfuscation. Charity is earned, it is not a right.

          Oh, yes, have nice day…

        • Disgusted says:

          Respectfully, the articles and comments – here and elsewhere – have not been “countless” and, no, the administration and board will not “fix” any problems because those in power do not acknowledge there are any problems to be fixed.

          This administration and the board are comprised of people who have not been working in the world of classical music, they have not been working in the world of academia, and they show nothing but contempt and disrespect for those faculty who have spent a combined millenia perfecting their art and teaching it to future generations.

          There need to be MANY MORE articles and comments. You are dead wrong, and so is anybody familiar with the people involved.

          There is no reason that any donor should contribute to CIM as it is presently constituted; indeed, they would do well to steer as clear of CIM as possible, so as not to be complicit in its downfall and, even, possibly criminally implicated in wrongdoing as the admin and board continually go around legally-binding institutional bylaws and policies.

          What’s happening at CIM is nothing but a pointless self-inflicted wound, an unnecessary exercise in power hungry self-service by those who haven’t the expertise even to spell the acronym CIM.

          I knew CIM to be a great music school of the world, which has been decimated in just a few short years. What took decades to build has been blown apart in no time by ignorance, arrogance, and utter disregard for the humanity of music, its practitioners, and its audiences.

          Problems can never be fixed by those creating the problems.

        • Hans Downe says:

          Maybe a better appreciation of classical music by the public would lessen the dependence on arrogant elitists seeking tax breaks. When music programs are stripped by Pubic School Teachers Unions demanding funds be shifted to social agendas you end up with Taylor Swift setting the cultural norm. If the only exposure to classical music is the occasional TV commercial background it’s not hard to understand public ignorance.

          • Woman conductor says:

            The teacher’s unions had nothing to do with cutting music, let alone to replace it with a social agenda! What an fiction!

            The cuts came from the right-wing, who have chipped away at everything good in education in the US for the last 40 years.

          • Hans Downe says:

            Oh, does your local school system have a orchestral music and fine arts program? How many teaching positions are available for classically trained music teachers? It’s not right or left wing, it’s a change in the way the arts are defined. I attended a public grade school in which every class room had a piano, there was a dedicated music classroom and music was a weekly subject. In addition there was a orchestra teacher who circulated between four schools, and we had regular concerts. That was a grade school. I believe public education was much less politicized then and more common sense. Our orchestra teacher despised the Beatles and went on extended tirades against them, they are worshipped now though by NPR. I use to enjoy seeing her get worked up to a bitter frenzy by “She loves you Yeh, Yeh, Yeh”. I never thought the Beatles were that talented but you of course couldn’t say that. RIP Miss McCloskey, I still agree with you.

          • Disgusted says:

            It most definitely is a right-wing decimation of the arts (no matter how they are defined). I’ve seen so many public and even private schools lose programs in art, music, drama, debate, languages, wood shop, etc. because right-wing “business people” who understand nothing but the desire for money think these “soft” subjects are a waste of public funds because they don’t emphasize the never-ending search for money. What they don’t seem to either realize or care about is that these arts programs help young minds develop discipline, logic, problem-solving, collaboration, and empathy. Kids who study the arts actually out-perform “business-only” and “STEM-only” kids in standardized tests and are better prepared for future life (whether that includes college or not).

  • Smoke & Mirrors says:

    Deborah Borda, where are you?

  • liz says:

    bring back gabe novak you cwoards

  • Eric Wright says:

    This board will simply use the paper these letters are printed on to wipe their…. (wasn’t there a school [not really] named after this body part mentioned here earlier this week?) It’s clear that this is what they want, and that’s that. They are certain they know what’s best for us plebs, obviously, as they smugly sit there with a fake salesman smile, condescendingly telling us to sit down and shut up.

    Sadly, the only thing that will potentially turn the tide is a complete implosion of enrollment and, by extension, career success of those who do attend. The board simply can’t survive if the institution also dies, or appears on the precipice of doing so.

    Rebuilding such an institution after trust and endowment are gone, however, is virtually impossible. Why trust your kids to CIM when there are plenty of places not being gutted from within? Why trust your brightest students to an institution that regularly, flagrantly expresses contempt to the next generation of students (who, by the way, pay their salaries…)?

    That all said…. why are some people – usually not musicians at all – so keen on gutting and destroying as many excellent institutions of higher learning as they can? What do they get out of it? Revenge for not being admitted? The fun of making underfunded artists suffer even more? I’ve served on two boards, and in neither case had anyone on either board ever dreamed of sabotaging their organization like this.

    I’ve sent a small handful of my students there over the years, and used to be quite proud of my own alumni status. No more on either count.

    • Shh says:

      Thank you Eric. It’s seems these days classical music and its institutions are a sinking ship. My impression has been people like this are opportunistic vultures taking as much as they can for themselves before the ship sinks. Obviously caring nothing for anyone else or any future hopes. Except those of their own. Of course.

  • Yaya says:

    Having grown up in Cleveland it is truly heartbreaking to observe CIM’s problems.

  • Tim says:

    If the faculty are unhappy, they should walk. Hopefully they’ll be happier wherever they end up. The conservatory will certainly be better off in the long run. Ultimately, everyone is replaceable, no matter how indispensable they may think they are. Same goes for administration, but ultimately, someone has to be in charge.

    • Disgusted says:

      and why should some of the finest musicians in the world have to leave their home (some having been there many decades) just because an arrogant, incompetent, ignorant administration takes over and runs the place into the ground?…yes, somebody has to be in charge, but you wouldn’t populate a medical school’s administration with people who’d never worked in the field of medicine, you likely wouldn’t get your car fixed by a sculptor, and you’d be a fool to have a pro football player perform your root canal…whoever that “somebody” in charge is, they should have a clue…

  • Curious says:

    Considering “This administration and the board are comprised of people who have not been working in the world of classical music, they have not been working in the world of academia” as written in a previous comment, who do the disgruntled faculty want as CIM president and provost? Are any of these faculty wishing to undertake these monumental positions? How would they remedy the situation?

    • SaveCIM says:

      There are many people out there who have the education, experience, and temperament to step in and right the ship. The questions right now are will the board do the right thing, and how much damage will Rothmann, Hogle, and Harrison do on their way out (assuming they go )?

  • CIM Alumnus says:

    Retributions from the president have begun – which was predictable. Yesterday they fired one of their biggest draws and greatest pedagogues – violist Mark Jackobs. Effective immediately. Leaves his students without a teacher heading into finals, graduation recitals, and juries. Blind loyalty is the only thing required by this admin and the students’ needs are irrelevant. Can’t wait to see which school is going to be the lucky one to be the first to snap him up! Maybe he and Michael Saks can carpool to Curtis!

  • Recent grad says:

    I don’t know the details of this situation (though I imagine that is true for almost everyone commenting), but the discussion seems quite one-sided.

    Why would the administration purposely try to destroy an institution they help run? The senior leaders have backgrounds in classical music, and it is probably a safe assumption they are advocates for the advancement of classical music, which means above all educating, training and supporting classical musicians. To suggest otherwise doesn’t seem genuine. Surely administrators with similar backgrounds and degrees could make more in the for-profit business world if money was their primary motivation.

    It is sad that such well regarded faculty left, and it is unfortunate that a bad hire was made (and the removal of this hire seems to have been rockier than anyone would have liked). However, surely there is a lot of good to celebrate? I know that many of my former classmates cherish our CIM education and are immensely proud to be alumni, and we credit the school and faculty for our success.

    Times change and institutions change. I am not a business person, but it is conceivable that the Board and administration have different goals than they did 10 or 20 years ago. And perhaps part of this change in vision is causing some turbulence in the short-term (and it may in the long-term as well). But I believe the fundamental goal remains the same — to make sure CIM can continue to raise the necessary funds to teach new musicians for decades and centuries to come, with increased reach and excellence with each passing year. I see they recently received their largest donation ever (one that seems to be upwards of 25% of the annual budget), something I didn’t see reported on this site. The last few years brought some of the most aggressive investments in both facilities (new and refurbished buildings) and programs (new guest faculty and partnerships) the institute has apparently seen since pre-2000.

    All that said, it is important that leaders reflect on mistakes. I would hope and assume they are. And I hope the larger community continues to support CIM, which certainly includes delivering critical yet constructive feedback!

    • Unacceptable says:

      As a fellow recent graduate of the program, I don’t find any reason to give this administration the benefit of the doubt, as you are so clearly intent on doing. At every possible turn, they’ve made it clear that their priority is their own financial profit, rather than the good education of their students by esteemed and valued faculty.

      How could you possibly see the president giving himself a 180k raise before cutting senior staff’s compensation to shreds as anything other than turning this once world-renowned conservatory into a personal get-rich-quick scheme?

      In 5 years, when every class is taught by a master’s graduate adjunct and its student body is comprised exclusively of rich kids who don’t know any better, this president will leave the institute and walk into the sunset with millions of dollars to show for it. There’s nothing to be proud of from this administration, even if the education I recieved from professors I loved was good for me.

  • MOST READ TODAY: