Queering Handel’s Messiah
OrchestrasClassical Uprising of Portland, Maine, are collaborating with ChamberQUEER of Brooklyn in putting on two performances of the popular oratorio this weekend. Here’s an extract from the extensive programme note by Dr Emily Isaacson:
Why mess with Messiah? So that more people can share in its power.
Messiah, by George Frideric Handel (1685–1759), tells the story of one man’s work to make his world a better place. The original composition was conceived as an Easter offering that chronicled Jesus’s birth, death, and resurrection. On a macro level, this is a story of creation, struggle, and transformation. This macro narrative is universal, and Handel’s music manifests these human experiences with incredible eloquence, but on a micro level, the details are limiting to other religions and frameworks of identity. Messiah Multiplied employs Handel’s powerful music, modifying and emboldening the libretto to reflect a more universal and inclusive story.
To be clear, we do not intend this project to be anti-religion or anti-classical canon. Quite the opposite. Repositioning the story allows it to resonate with Jewish and ecumenical traditions. Reimagining the text lets it speak to a 21st-century audience. Messiah Multiplied, like so much of Classical Uprising’s work, is inspired by a belief that classical music must rise up, challenge current norms, and re-envision where, how, and for whom we are making music. Our era is marked by an unwillingness to listen to one another; we choose communities and news sources that reinforce our existing views and villainize alternative opinions. Messiah Multiplied galvanizes Handel’s seminal work to help people better understand themselves and each other, and to serve as a tool for discussion, connection, and acceptance.
While this approach may seem brazen, the ethos of Messiah Multiplied is anchored not only in Handel’s music but in the artistic traditions of the Baroque era.
Handel, like many Baroque composers, prioritized the performance experience over an “accurate” rendition of the original score. From the work’s inception in 1741 to Handel’s death in 1759, the composer constantly modified Messiah, as academics explain, to bring new interest to audience members, to oblige the needs of a particular soloist, or to compensate for changing performance conditions. Ultimately,
nearly a third of Messiah underwent revision during Handel’s lifetime, with some arias and choruses existing in three or four different versions. As scholar Jens Peter Larsen explains: ‘The basic question is whether we can talk at all correctly of an “authentic” form of Messiah, understood in our later sense as a final version which as a whole and in details presents the composer’s ultimate view of the form in which he wished to hand down his work to posterity. Strictly speaking, there is no such version.’ For Handel, Messiah was a fluid document intended to be altered for different audiences, not a rigid work of art…
Classical Uprising and ChamberQUEER aspire to make classical music more inclusive, but this project strives for an even loftier goal: to encourage our audience to ask what we can all do to bring about acceptance. Our world is suffering from our inability to speak without yelling and to listen to ideas different from our own. Without civil discourse and without accepting our shared differences as being
worthy of kindness and compassion, we will be our own undoing. Messiah Multiplied aims to encourage open-minded conversation, to foster acceptance, and to ask, “What if ‘Messiah’ is not someone but something: an ethic of care, a movement of inclusivity? What if ‘Messiah’ is a change we can bring about together?”
Your thoughts?
are these people on glue?
Absolutely
“His woke is easy”?
Handel always dressed in drag so he probably would have approved of this mess. Good riddance
Marxism isn’t happy until everything of intrinsic worth is totally corrupted or destroyed.
Queer theory has nothing to do with Marxism. You clearly haven’t read Marx.
“Queer Theory” and identity politics has everything to do with an ideology built on robbing others of their work and wealth (and very lives) based purely on a puerile sense of resentment.
What on earth has this to do with Karl
Marx? His comments on women, race and homosexuality would today be judged as actionable under our hate speech laws.
A lot of this simply depends on what the changes are. But isn’t this cultural appropriation at the least? Would Handel have wanted his music modified in this way? Of course there are more and less tasteful ways to modify a piece, but this is a straight up repurposing.
Of course this is not the first time for this sort of thing, I’ve heard a rock-ified Hallelujah Chorus in a Southern Baptist church, certainly also an effort to modernize Handel’s work to reach new audiences.
My main thought is at what point do we admit that we just don’t trust new composers to write anything very good, so queer people needing to express themselves have to turn to repurposing a highly religious work about Jesus’ life? That is the real tragedy, that they could not think of a better way to get their point across.
It is a bit difficult to have any thoughts if you don’t know what they have actually done with/to the work. The post is a bit enigmatic on concrete details…
Messiah Multiplied employs Handel’s powerful music, modifying and emboldening the libretto to reflect a more universal and inclusive story.”
That’s about as “concrete” as they get, but it is pretty clear. A libretto written to their agenda is more universal and inclusive than the story of Christ’s life, death and resurrection, which have been embraced by billions since it was first told.
&^%*$*#@^&*
Elsewhere in the programme note:
Messiah Multiplied employs the music written by Handel but reorders the movements and modifies the pronouns of Jennens’s text to create a more inclusive version of Messiah. This involves making the pronouns for God and Messiah gender neutral and the central character “we” instead of “he.”
This of course makes it all about ‘them’, which I suppose is typical of modern thinking.
“On a macro level,” these kids need to go to Sunday school.
It’s disingenuous to speak of the “fluidity” of Messiah in Handel’s lifetime, which concerned changing details of the musical setting, NOT the biblical text. The present effort lost me right at the start, with “that their inequity (sic) is abolished.” Here’s the libretto: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e29d63700c2293a99d9693e/t/65403f3e40801207a340685c/1698709312370/Texts+-+Messiah+Multiplied.pdf
Thanks for the link. Here is another sample: “Why do the nations so furiously rage against us? And why do the people make us their enemy, deny our humanity?
We must once again rise up, as the rulers take counsel together against our lives and
our autonomy.”
So it is all turned into yet another complaint about the victimisation of LGBTQ+ people.
If anybody wants to read the full program, it is here: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5e29d63700c2293a99d9693e/t/653947366e665b20189b28ef/1698252598382/Program+Notes+-+Messiah+Multiplied+10.24.23.pdf
No thoughts, only a yawn.
Trotsky is said to have yawned just before he took an ice axe to the skull.
My thoughts on that woke claptrap are unprintable. But the alterations we all know Handel made to the Messiah through its life and his were dictated by musical necessity; he did not presume to “reimagine” the life of Christ beyond what he had lifted from biblical sources as his original inspiration.
Many gay men’s choirs have performed Messiah in the past, and very well in many cases. This shower is driven by agenda rather than music. I wish such groups would write their own music and librettos and leave the canon alone.
Is this a Halloween joke?
Write your own “WOKE” oratorio. Don’t impose your ideology on someone else’s music.
The essay doesn’t actually explain how this “Messiah” is changed, different, queer, sexually ambiguous or topically updated from the canonical performing editions, though the history of musical revisions is illuminating. I wouldn’t write off a re-imagined “Messiah” sight-unseen or sound-unheard.
A couple of years ago, I enjoyed a production of Handel’s “Giustino” by Long Beach Opera (a company with a long history as an incubator of re-imagined opera stagings) that played up the ambiguities of gender that were already present in Baroque opera back in the day.
Taken together with a modern orchestral arrangement by Shelley Washington that mixed period instruments with rock instruments, it was fresh, it was dramatic, it was high quality music-wise and it was recognizably Handel as well as recognizably “today.”
What a load of drivel!
“Handel’s Messiah tells the story of one man’s work to make his world a better place.”
Uh, no. That particular story is rather more ambitious.
Oh dear…
This is an outrage! Where is the black indigenous one eyed, hobbling, non binary she/it sorceress, singing I know my redeemer liveth?
Even a black indigenous one eyed, hobbling, non binary she/it sorceress can come to Messiah in a life-altering moment of revelation and recognition!
‘What is truth?’ Pilate asked Jesus before handing Him over to be crucified. He was so blind that he didn’t realize he was staring at the Truth in the face. Handel’s “Messiah” is one of the greatest masterpieces of all time even though many orchestra musicians loath playing the 3+ hour work. More people have heard the Gospel message through Handel’s evangelic work than all of Billy Graham’s crusades combined. There’s a divine reason why the piece is still so popular to this day. The blind, deaf & stone hearts along with those whose veil has been lifted will continue to flock to its performances. Modernizing the music or rearranging the score is a matter of taste. Imposing a different interpretation of a dead composer’s work is anyone’s prerogative. Altering the Biblical message is an abomination. Revelation 22:18-19. Orchestra Uprising and ChamberQueer should heed God’s warning. Truth is exclusive, not inclusive. Facts don’t care about anyone’s opinion. Clearly, we are living in the ‘days of Noah.’ May God have mercy.
“Altering the Biblical message is an abomination. Revelation 22:18-19. Orchestra Uprising and ChamberQueer should heed God’s warning. Truth is exclusive, not inclusive. Facts don’t care about anyone’s opinion.”
Rather odd that you seem to be claiming that the Bible, or the biblical god, is factual.
And the hand-wringing in all the posts about changing the biblical text, oh c’mon. It’s well documented that the Bible evolved over a long period of time by humans who had their own motivations for including some things but not others. Not to mention issues with translations.
As if Handel gave two hoots about the Bible! He was a businessman through and through. The libretto of Messiah could have been about cows, so long as it sold tickets and filled seats.
You are assuming your own hearing of the piece is the way everyone else hears it AND the way the composer intended it. Find your own divine inspiration in this work, by all means, but don’t tell us how we have to hear or perform it!
Ridiculous.
To a hammer, everything is a nail.
The Messiah means Saviour, which is Jesus. In the context, He said : There is only one Way to the Father, that is through Me. As such the Messiah is inclusive of all who choose to believe. No need to dilute or amplify Händel’s original intent during composition, which history shows was full the revelation of the Holy Spirit.
“What if Messiah is not someone ” is wrong because logically, HISTORICALLY, religiously, …..Messiah was a man . It’s better to be honest and say although He was someone, but we want to get some good ideas from him and emphasize those qualities.
At first , it was said that they don’t intend this project to be anti religion or …..how could it not to be against religion when they ignor or reject the center of Christianity, the Messiah as a real historic man and make it just good , politically correct consepts?
Sacrilegious.
It’s all public domain now.
One can do anything one wants with it, especially since it causes no loss of the original.
Canon fodder?
Why do the readers rage? The essay describing the concept is thoughtful and respectful. It is one concept in a million, and probably a far better performance than many others. I’ve played Messiah in unusual translations and in a tacky pop version. Handel and I survived. Don’t like it, don’t go. It doesn’t need to be your thing.
I can remember visiting the Handel House in London where an elderly white British guide told everyone Handel lived with his servant and left him everything.
An obviously gay solution to anti-homosexuality in much earlier days. The guide was clueless.
What if you wrote your own music to accomodate your own agenda, and left the arts alone?…
My comment is unprintable. I suspect Handel’s would be too.
No just no!
As a lover of music and this being in my home city my heart is sad! It is only increasing the identity crisis!