Mixed reports from Vienna on Netrebko’s lumpy Bohème

Mixed reports from Vienna on Netrebko’s lumpy Bohème

News

norman lebrecht

September 12, 2022

One overnight enthusiast counted 19 minutes of applause.

Our resident critic Larry L. Lash writes that even her most fervent supporters struggled to summon much enthusiasm.

Here’s Larry’s review, exclusive to slippedisc.com:

Larry L. Lash
12 September 2022
Slipped Disc

Wiener Staatsoper’s sold-out season-opening run of “La bohème” stands as proof that if enough media scream about something in the name of music and sensation, people will fight to pay good cash for an at-best mediocre experience.

Four performances of “La bohème” (and one of “Carmen”) were substituted on two weeks’ notice for a highly-anticipated return of Halévy’s “La Juive” when both Roberto Alagna and Aleksandra Kurzak cancelled for health reasons. Staatsoper Intendant Bogdan Roščić claimed there was not enough time to properly rehearse the show with new principal singers, an argument which I don’t totally believe.

Instead, Franco Zeffirelli’s 1963 production was trotted out last night for the 450th time with Anna Netrebko and Vittorio Grigolo, who each appeared in two performances as Mimì and Rodolfo in 2010 and 2013 respectively. Had elements of direction been imparted to them while rehearsing for those performances, they were clearly forgotten. On this occasion, the only rule of the staging (which remains credited to Zeffirelli) seemed to be to face the audience and ignore your onstage colleagues. Even the child who gets to whine one line among the gaudiness of the second act turned from his mother to shout it to the house.

The biggest offender was Grigolo, who seemed to have a hand and/or body gesture for every syllable. At least twice – including his part in the brief duet before Mimì’s death – he swung Netrebko around so he could directly belt into the auditorium.

The only vague sense of character development came from Rodolfo’s roommates – George Petean (Marcello), Martin Häßler (Schaunard), and Günther Groissböck (Colline) – and debuting Armenian soprano Nina Minasyan as Musetta. Both Groissböck and Minasyan were holdovers from the cast of “La Juive”.

In their smaller roles, Minasyan and Häßler gave the show a much-needed injection of youth and a promise of careers to follow.

Minasyan, a bel canto coloratura specialist, sang her one big number with a substantial crystalline tone and faithfulness to the score. Her only liberties were holding onto the set piece’s highest note and adding a lovely diminuendo to another. She seemed restrained by the production, acting as coquettish as possible within its restraints and an ugly crimson and black feathered dress. Her Musetta was a delightful break from the oft-heard shrieking harpy as this seconda donna and made one want to hear her in a lead role.

Häßler, an ensemble member with some memorable performances already under his belt, showed a supple lyric baritone, concentration to detail, and an endearing stage presence. One can only hope he is being groomed for bigger roles (at this stage in his career he would make an ideal Billy Budd).

Günther Groissböck gave the impression of Hunding singing Puccini with his cavernous, raven-black basso, but delivered a surprisingly touching “Vecchia zimarra, senti”. Appropriately pompous as Colline, he offered more than a glimpse of who this character is, and attempted to inject some humour into the dullness of his life with his roommates who are supposed to be four dudes having fun.

Listening to George Petean made me want to hear him as Posa in “Don Carlo(s)” and sure enough: he’s sung it 20 times on this stage in both the French and Italian editions. For a character who gets no big solo moment, Petean’s Marcello registered immediately with his dedication to the importance of this role and to maintaining an artful vocal line. His beautifully burnished, warm baritone provided some of the vocal highlights of the evening, although he needs to take care of a break above the passaggio where his volume noticeably lessens and the tone thickens.

I can’t understand the appeal of Vittorio Grigolo. He is, to put it as nicely as possible, a ham, and his vocal production reckless and sloppy: late entrances, a tendency to slide into notes, cut them off abruptly, make frequently unsuccessful stabs at high notes and landing flat, and slice through ensembles with piercing tone when focus threatened to wander from Rodolfo.

“Che gelida manina” consisted of distorted, broken statements absent of any cohesion and ended with Grigolo downstage facing front, declaring his love not for the one but for the many.

As an actor, any boyish charm he may have had has been overridden with a jejune greed for attention. He aped Pavarotti’s slicking back of his hair when he first hears Mimì and realises that she is “una donna”; one could see him process Musetta’s declaration that she has brought a deathly ill Mimì to him: hear the news, process it, raise an outstretched palm to his forehead, and utter “Ah”. For his solo bow, he jumped from behind the red curtain with arms aloft as if he had just won a marathon, and then kissed his hand and placed it on the stage, a gesture usually reserved for a return after a long absence or the final performance of a career.

Anna Netrebko received no controversial diva’s welcome at her entrance: no bravas or boos. From her first notes it was apparent her once-gorgeous, creamy soprano so perfect for Violetta, Adina or Manon (in both the Massenet and Puccini versions) has been damaged by forcing it beyond its natural gifts into unsuitable dramatic roles such as Lady Macbeth, Turandot, and Abigaille.

Line could not be sustained throughout this very long evening; vocal tone was uneven and often noticeably below pitch; a widening tremolo worsened as the performance wore on. There are now three distinct registers: welcome but isolated glimpses of her radiant, creamy upper voice; forced gravely bottom notes created for her dramatic soprano roles; a disconcertingly unsupported middle voice (where, unfortunately, much of Mimì’s music lies), sounding more like Sprechstimme than verismo romanticism. One could hear what Netrebo intended to do, but the voice to fulfil her wishes simply is no longer there, so obvious in the monochromatic results.

The third act was the most difficult to hear: as opposed to screaming along with Grigolo, when matched with Petean the difference between a voice which is healthy and one that is not was distracting. Cracks began to appear, disturbingly so in simple lines which as the first utterance of “O mia vita”. “D’onde lieta usci al tuo grido” has sparse underscoring and without a loud orchestra telling her where to focus, Netrebko sang wildly off pitch, her tone becoming sour.

This tubercular seamstress was a one-dimensional character, incapable of projecting the joys of young love or the downward spiral into illness and death.

Netrebko and Grigolo were not made for each other: her innately reedy tone and his strident, steely tenor made for a mix of cream and lemon. Someone decided to skip the direction in the libretto that the last sung notes of the first act – the word “amor” sung thrice – are to be sung offstage after departing the flat. The first two showed just how mismatched this couple was, and with both taking a stab at a high C on the last note we got screeches on two different pitches.

I was honestly shocked that maestro Bertrand de Billy allowed much of this to occur. He was content with letting the singers determine his tempi often resulting in gaps in the music. Given the conversational nature of Rodolfo and Mimì’s meeting, Grigolo took his time deciding when to cue the orchestra that he was ready for them to resume. Stage directions written into the music were distorted, as when Rodolfo searches for water to sprinkle over Mimì’s forehead, breaking any line in the music and action.

This was simply a messy performance. For the first two acts, a great deal of the heavier orchestrations drowned out one and all. The orchestra never rose above in-house pit band reliability and was marred by particularly nasty brass-playing. With so much of the music sung straight out into the hall, one would think the cast might occasionally have a look at the conductor, but any cues or suggestions were ignored.

For what was trumpeted as one of the biggest events of the season, this feast of arm-waving in a crumbling, directionless production showed no sense of occasion. Applause was, at best, polite with Netrebko’s stalwart fans unable to rev-up enthusiasm.

photo: Vienna Staatsoper/Michael Pöhn

Comments

  • andrew says:

    “he is, to put it as nicely as possible, a ham,…” – must remember that line for future reviews.

  • PS says:

    So Netrebko is… not 30, and Grigolo is… Italian? Who knew?

    • JJ says:

      ‘Who knew?’ (or rather who didn’t knew) Why, you obviously, if this is all that has stuck with you from the review. Though, come to think of it, the ‘not 30’ is your original contribution – how enlightening this must be for those who have somehow missed google all these decades. I have heard singers well past the magic age of 30 (or past 50 for that matter) delivering very good vocal performances, but AN isn’t among them. I have also seen Italian singers who don’t confuse scenery chewing with acting, Grigolo not one of them.

  • Hermann Lederer says:

    I could not agree more with most of this review but even when we dislike something we should stick to the truth. It was nearly 20 minutes enthusiastic applause and Netrebko got an enormous ovation.

    • Larry L. Lash says:

      I stayed through two sets of principal cast and solo curtain calls. When the house lights came up, the vast majority of people in the Parkett and standing room had already left or were on their way up the aisles. The applause almost ceased, but the diehard fans kept on screaming, as they do for many a favoured singer or dancer in Wiener Staatsballett, refusing to leave until more curtain calls are given with the hope of another solo call for their beloved. On many occasions I have seen maybe 20 people crammed into the front rows asking for – and being granted – more and more curtain calls, from the full cast (or those who deigned to stick around long enough) and maybe a few solos. Do 20 minutes really matter, when there is only a small but very noisy contingent dragging it out? It most certainly was not as if the entire audience stayed to cheer! Even the fans couldn’t spring for a bouquet or two.

    • JJ says:

      @Hermann, if you are right and Lash is wrong, yours is the most damning comment I have read about the crowd who usually books the opening of the season. I am sure you didn’t intend it to be damning, but it is, which makes it even more satisfying 😉

      But, you know, I find Lash’s account more believable, it is something I have witnessed myself many times in various houses, though not at the opening of the season, which I avoid. I have never witnessed a full house 20 min uninterrupted ovation anywhere, such mythical accounts belong to the past.

  • KCB says:

    “with both taking a stab at a high C on the last note we got screeches on two different pitches” … !

  • Tim says:

    “…the vast majority of people in the Parkett and standing room had already left…”

    As Hermann Lederer put it, that is simply not true. I’m not sure about the 20minutes, but it was definitely louder and longer than the last couple of times I was at the Opera.
    Netrebko got more applause than for example Nina Stemme last June as Brünnhilde, and she was cheered quite heavily for her performances.
    I’m not sure, if Netrebko’s voice has been better in the past – since I haven’t seen her live before. But it probably was, because that’s just a typical age-thing. The audience seemed to not care about that tho. Either they didn’t share your option or they are just not very well versed (just as I am 😉

  • MMcGrath says:

    Good points below. Performances like this, in Vienna, are not mounted for the discerning music afficionado. They are circus performances for the masses at top prices that support the pension funds… We’ve got to have both. We KNEW in advance what this Boheme would be like. Good fun, standing “ovations” as the German-speakers say, and a something to talk about at the next party. So why’d ya go, huh?

  • Robin says:

    Oh, dear. Imagine what damage Ms Netrebko might do if she became a singing teacher.

  • IP says:

    I believe people have the right to pay a lot of money for a bad performance and applaud it enthusiastically — as long as it is not obligatory and there are other choices. I haven’t been to the opera since Covid struck but I vividly remember the last time: Nabucco with Anna Pirozzi and the same George Petean, superb. Now, if you want, you can spend five times as much to witness Domingo as a kind of Nabucco, with some partners to match. Impress your kind, too.

  • Stephan von Cron says:

    All these comments and the critique itself are a clear demonstration of what a sorry state the international opera stages are in today. Singers, conductors and stage directors are only concerned about the media sensation they can cause rather than the vocation, as it still very much was in the 70s and 80s, to defend great works with every fiber of what they could give to them.

    • Heather Cole says:

      I so agree, but here is the problem. Shambolic and self-promoting behaviors and mediocre-to-bad performances at the premier houses are demoralizing, create a bad impression, and I fear are very debilitating to funding and audience-building at the regional and municipal level. I want my grandsons to hear and come to love the music and the theatre, (standard beloved repertoire first, I guess). If the art form is made to look foolish at its heights, there won’t be that much for them to see at the local venues.

  • torches and pitchforks says:

    When it comes to Netrebko, everyone on both sides has an agenda. She will probably go down in history as the artist that had the most BS written about her. Here’s an article about the performance from the Guardian that attempts to be neutral:

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/12/divisions-russian-soprano-anna-netrebko-invasion-ukraine

    • Save the MET says:

      So you are trying to say in a partisan way, she is the Trump of sopranos. Most people of fame, who are defamed in the press are done so with good reason.

  • Save the MET says:

    She became lumpy and so did her singing. That said, Vienna is one of the few places that will still let Domingo and Putin supporters sing. Problematic all the way around.

  • Tom Ponti says:

    From what I saw on You Tube, most of what Larry had to say was false. Anna and Vittorio looked and sounded very good, at least. The looked at and reacted to each other as much as any other MIMI and Rodolfo I ever saw. Not too may great sopranos of the past, except Freni, would be as vocally and physically appealing as MIMI, past 50.

    • JJ says:

      We must have watched different broadcasts. From what I saw on YouTube, most of what Larry had to say is true. The ‘stars’ were the liability.

      AN sang so often under pitch with a hollow voice (the beginning of D’onde lieta) or with a cavernous voice (everywhere else), that it wasn’t even funny. D’onde lieta was indeed the wildly off pitch fest Larry has mentioned. Singing in bed in the last act proved to be disastrous, so she got up for Sono andati, but it didn’t prevent her from starting off sounding like Mamma Lucia in Cavalleria. Got back into bed for the last lines, pitch sagging, hands clinging to Musetta’s muff, Grigolo chewing the coverlet, and that was it. Acting-wise, she looked and moved like a Matrioshka doll who believed herself in Adriana Lecouvreur, with a curiously immobile face. They really should have reminded her at the beginning of the third act that she’s in La Boheme and Marcello isn’t the Princesse de Bouillon. In that one moment when Mimi and Marcello grabbed each other manfully by the shoulder and faced the audience I fully expected them to introduce the third opera of the evening and switch to Dio che nell’alma infondere.

      Grigolo’s hair is an implausible shade of jet black, and he could have given monkeys in the zoo a lesson in hyperactivity. I have never seen such wild and off character gesticulation in Che gelida manina, and that was just the beginning. In the third act he mimed the ‘viscontino’ section, and in the end he was wiping his face and nose with Mimi’s inert hand. The voice has a sharp tinge in the upper half and can sound like sandpaper in the lower half when he forces, but he didn’t wander off pitch as much as his Mimi. His diction must have been acquired at the Bergonzi school, so full it was of ‘sh’ in places where it shouldn’t have been.

      Both stage and the wings must have been studded with microphones of all sizes. It didn’t make any difference in the broadcast sound if the characters were singing on stage, off stage, with their back to the audience, or with their face buried in fabric. The costume department should be informed that it isn’t to their credit when Mimi is singing about her cuffietta rosa wearing a yellow one. The ribbons may be pink but the bonnet isn’t.

      I disagree with Larry in one respect, AN’s voice had never been ideal for Violetta or Adina, her technique was even fifteen years ago too sloppy for bel canto roles.

  • andre Hendrix says:

    LIES LIES LIES….I don’t know what you were hearing, but none of what was said about anna is true. I’ve heard the performance..It’s obvious this site just doesn’t like her… I’d rather you say nothing than put this false shit on here just to detract her…FO

  • MOST READ TODAY: