Lang Lang and his tricky spots
mainNo, not an enduring adolescent disorder.
Nor the bit in the Brahms D minor concerto (which I don’t remember him ever playing).
It’s the sub-head on his latest cover story.
Made my day.
Comments
MOST READ TODAY:
-
News
UPDATE: Juilliard professor caught in the act is fired
We gather that Juilliard has summarily fired a…
-
RIP
Flute legend dies, at 99
The death has been communicated of Walfrid Kujala,…
-
Orchestras
Music director quits before he starts
From the Youngstown Symphony Orchestra, in Ohio: Sergey…
-
Orchestras
How musicians brought their orchestra back from bankruptcy
When Ontario’s Kitchener-Waterloo Symphony went bust in September…
And Karajan always refused to conduct that piece (the Brahms D minor concerto). There must be something about it that makes some musical minds recoil.
That’s also a mystery for me. I would love to have some information about it. Another question: Why he never recorded Tannhäuser?
There’s a live one from Vienna.
Lang Lang played Brahms 1 in Carnegie Hall on 5/21/09 (Met Orchestra). Hard to imagine he wouldn’t have programmed it elsewhere around that time.
There is a live recording of Tannhäuser (Vienna State Opera
Karajan was terrified of its the orchestral introduction.
Purely coincidental but the trills at the start remind me of the opening of Mahler 3 .
Looks like he has played the Brahms D minor as a matter of fact. The reviewer doesn’t seem very pleased.
http://www.musicweb-international.com/SandH/2008/Jan-Jun08/lang_lang2003.htm
Sv Richter refused to play 1st concerto because first movement is d minor, 2nd d major and 3rd d minor/major.
That review was scathing. I chanced to hear last week a very early morning Classical 24 broadcast of Lang Lang, Mischa Maisky and Vadim Repin murdering Rachmaninov, trio elegiaque 1, in very much the same way. If L L could make Brahms sound like Rachmaninov, imagine what horrors he inflicts on Rachmaninov himself! (The performance in the last SD daily comfort zone is fine.) Lang Lang will not get my Udiscover vote!
Yes, he has played it several times, including once in New York in 2009. James Levine conducted the Met Orchestra https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/23/arts/music/23met.html
The New York performance was equally clueless. One of my favorite pieces for 50 years.
I listen to Lang Lang when I want to hear the classics being manhandled beyond recognition, like his new Goldberg.
At least we’ve been spared Glenn Gould’s turgid maundering of the 1st concerto, the whole proceedings enlivened by Bernstein’s hilarious disclaimer. (I normally have nothing but unfettered admiration for GG)
He played it with Levine and the Met Orch. Faint praise indeed in a review :
”
Mr. Lang managed to hit most, if not all, of the notes of this expansive concerto without allowing any rubato, dynamic contrast or poetic expression stand in the way of his declarative statement. The argument against him in the past was his reliance on histrionic physical gestures, but now that he has considerably cleaned up his act, it is difficult not to concentrate on his lack of soulful interpretation. This current exercise was neither elegant nor eloquent.
The sum total of Mr. Levine’s involvement was a rather worried stare at one point when Mr. Lang fell behind an entire measure, but the orchestra, sounding quite lovely to be sure, simply went through the motions rather than the emotions of the piece. […] much of this particular crowd, judging from their applause at the end of the first movement and their war-whooping at the work’s conclusion, was an unsophisticated one. Perhaps this was a sufficient effort for their initial foray into Brahms, but for those who expected something beyond a by the numbers experience – and paid well over one hundred dollars to hear it, the Carnegie Hall season ended on a sour note.
Norman, you may want to read the cover again…
‘Tricky spots’ is not the subheading for Lang Lang’s interview. That is the sub heading for the masterclass.
So this is very misleading.