Can you tell the sex of a conductor by listening?
mainWould you believe this is the subject of academic research? How do these people justify their jobs?
Comments
MOST READ TODAY:
-
Opera
Joyce DiDonato survives the US election
Message from the Kansas diva: Last night: I…
-
Orchestras
Just in: NY Phil confirms dismissal of two principals
Deborah Borda, acting CEO, confirmed today that principal…
-
News
If Badura-Skoda’s Haydn was a fake, what price the new Chopin?
From a Guardian article, based on a BBC…
-
Opera
Silly sums: $2 billion to renew an opera house?
From SWR: The planned renovation of the Stuttgart…
Dear Norman,
Thank you for posting this link on your website. As I only launched the survey yesterday, I am impressed by the speed at which it has reached you.
Just one small correction. I am not a salaried academic, I do not receive any remuneration for academic work, and I am not in receipt of a research grant. This research project is being carried out in my spare time and is, I hope, an engaging approach to an important contemporary issue.
I assume the key part of the study is the effect of gender on how conductors are perceived, a valid and important topic.
Given the way that Hollywood can “cover” actors with digital characters as in “Avatar,” I admit that I’ve been curious as to what might happen if conductors are “covered” by digital avatars of the opposite gender. I would LOVE to see one of those old dust-covered, hidebound orchestras get their comeuppance by being subjected to an experiment where they thought they were being conducted by a man/woman and were really being conducted by a woman/man. Let’s see how that stuff REALLY plays out.
But, I’m sorry, to discuss Gender and Conducting may be one thing, but to ask the question of whether you can hear their gender in the music is absurd and is itself insulting. It’s like asking if you can “hear” the color of the conductor’s skin. The question is offensive.
I agree with you. This is quite offensive in its presumed premise. There is no rationale provided for undertaking the research study – what is the basis for believing such research is needed? One can only guess here, ranging from something that is perhaps legit (though I cant think what) through to a topic no-one else is likely to have tackled and thereby getting attention for doing something different. While I can understand the importance of examining the relevance of visual cues in relation to audience responses to conducting based on gendered thinking, it is disturbing that an academic committee would approve a study seeking to identify differences based on aural cues. The result is already known – no significant difference.
We may know that gender doesn’t make a difference in conducting or other forms of music-making, but it hasn’t been subjected to much formal proof, so people continue to hold on to the belief that it does. This study could thus help allay chauvinistic beliefs. The blind test could serve as a useful control measure for comparison with other parts of the study. The problem is that web surveys aren’t entirely scientific since people can fill out the forms several times under different identities, but even a generalized sampling that gives us an impression of how people are thinking might be useful.
In spite of all the hopes proposed by cultural feminism in the 70s, it is turning out that women truly aren’t any different than men…. Or are they? Is it a hope worth holding, or is it merely another doorway to sexism? (And of course, I know this is a very poor forum for thoughtful discussion of such matters.)
Modern neurological science now knows for sure, that there are mental differences between men and women, in statistic significant manifestations. Physiological differences are already obvious. The idea that men and women are not different, is an outdated and yet ideologically overcharged subject for quite some time now.
Stating the obvious, namely that there are differences, does not make a statement about one side being better than the other. That’s the stupid yet common fallacy, that too many are falling for in discussing this subject.
No one has proven these differences create perceptible differences in the performance of classical music.
That’s correct. Nobody has proven that Furtwängler was a better conductor than Tonscanini either. 😉
But you can hear and prove perceptible differences exist in their conducting.
Actually not. You can’t prove that (anymore). Because you can’t exclude other factors. You can prove differences exist, but not unambiguously connect them to the conducting only, except maybe the beginning tempo.
The only valid research would be one with the same orchestra at about the same time, only different conductors. Then you could make some kind of assessment. Otherwise it is like comparing apples and bicycles.
You can’t study the influences of the conductor, if you change the orchestra players, because different players perceive and react differently.
Not true. One could, for example, compare the tempi in the recordings of Beethoven’s Symphonies by Walter and Toscanini with numerous orchestras and demonstrate differences that are quite consistent.
I already agreed about the opening tempi. But that’s it. You can’t conclude much else from a recording, if you want to compare the conductor’s influence unambiguously. The only reasonable test would be with an identical orchestra, only thing changing the conductor.
Only opening tempi? I would have like to have seen some hapless musicians back in those non-union days try to resist Toscanini’s tempos which varied throughout works. OTH, today’s jet set conductors do little more than glorified readings with orchestras. The differences between their performances are less pronounced.
Mining data for preference and perception is a very big deal. The algorithms that implement them will soon become as standard in the fine arts as they have become in the rest of daily life.
Our host scoffs at his peril.
Although I find it irrelevant if a man or a woman conducts, I guessed the majority (5 out of 7) right.
Will be interesting to see the results.
Norman, you don’t have to give every viola player a hard time, they suffer enough.
Since you are reporting a relative success of your guessing (unless it was completely random in which case the numbers are irrelevant), you must have used some kind of criteria, which means that you did expect to hear certain differences in musical results achieved by male vs female conductors. It would be interesting to know what considerations guided your guesses when you were correct and what exactly went against your expectations in those two instances when you were wrong.
What issue is this trying to resolve?
The issue whether lady’s parts would distract from the players’ parts.
I have always found a very few male conductors In the highest rank to have a decided ability over the acknowledged best female conductors. I would love to be proven wrong someday.
Why would you “love to be proven wrong”? What exactly does not satisfy you in the situation as you have described it? Would you be happier if male conductors become much better than their female colleagues? Why would that be better than, for example, the reverse? For me personally, the best scenario would be for all conductors to be great musicians.
I don’t understand your question. Or, maybe, you don’t understand my statement.
I don’t understand your question/statement. Or, you don’t understand mine.