The Brazil Symphony Orchestra has been officially cleared by the labor court to ‘evaluate’ its musicians by means of re-audition, a process that has already led to several musicians being

suspended or dismissed. It is unlikely that this process will win anyone a gold medal for excellence in human relations. The statement is reproduced below:

A Justiça do Trabalho rejeitou o pedido de liminar feito pelo Sindicato dos Músicos, que solicitava o cancelamento das avaliações de desempenho dos músicos da OSB. A Justiça entendeu que não existiu qualquer ilegalidade no ato da comunicação das avaliações, bem como ressaltou o caráter consultivo da Comissão de Músicos da OSB, que pode ou não ser convocada pelo Presidente da FOSB quando o próprio julgar necessário. A Justiça também entendeu que a FOSB, como instituição privada, tem o direito de usar da prerrogativa de empregador e avaliar seus músicos quando julgar conveniente.

Clique o link abaixo para ler o documento na íntegra no blog OSB Em Pauta.

The Labor Court rejected the request filed by the Musicians Union, which asked for the cancellation of the OSB musicians’ performance evaluations. The Court also pointed out the consultative character of the OSB Musicians Commission, which may or not be called upon the FOSB President whenever he himself finds it necessary. The Court also understood that FOSB, as a private institution, has the right to make use of the employer’s prerogative and evaluate their musicians whenever they find it convenient.



From the same source, here’s a protracted justification of the re-audition procedure by the OSB manager, Eleazar de Carvalho, jr, son of the formative conductor. And, beneath that, an independent dissenting view.



         OSB:  crisis or opportunity to continue to evolve 
                
        Eleazar de Carvalho Filho, President of the OSB Foundation 

The Brazilian Symphony Orchestra achieved 70 years of uninterrupted 
activity last year. We passed through several phases, some grandiose, 
others with
large difficulties in honor
ing the legacy of those who 
founded the orchestra in 1940. The OSB was a pioneer among Brazilian 
Orchestras in the recordings, tours abroad and in the identification of 
talents recognized nowadays. As a private foundation, we have the 
privilege of having the investment of public and private partners to 
maintain our business and then continue to deserve the trust of loyal 
subscribers and the general public. We have an obligation to be 
accountable to society and our educational and social programs are 
aimed at integrating us to Rio de Janeiro and Brazil. 
Our various concert series represents the “product” for which we are 
judged, either for the diversity and innovation in our programming, or 
by soloists and conductors who present with us as guests and by the 
quality and dedication of our musicians. The Reviewers praised the 2010 
season and we are very grateful to the great artists that took part in 
it. The OSB Foundation Board of Trustees, as well as their managers, 
has worked tirelessly, without any sort of pay, to seek continuity and 
the continuous improvement of the orchestra. We know that there is no 
guarantee for our existence, and we have to keep on preserving the 
tradition that has been conquered by OSB. 
We have recently announced that we would carry out performance 
evaluations in order to introduce an additional element to the 
evaluation process that occurs on the day-by-day of the orchestral 
body. We have scheduled individual assessments, within parameters that 
occur in large orchestras and with musicians from abroad to make up 
most of the evaluation boards. Our goal, when choosing external 
evaluators and of recognized competence, was to ensure total 
impartiality to the process, but also, especially, to be able to give a 
set of suggestions to the musicians to their possible improvement. 
After all, improvement is the key word in an orchestra like the OSB. We 
set up a deadline of two months, during annual leave which is meant for 
that period, so that musicians could get prepared properly. The 
required repertoire, which was judged as being extensive by some, was 
extracted, mostly from the same works that have been played over the 
past two years. Finally, the decision was to cover the entire 
orchestral body for equality reasons, to allow musicians to plead 
change of level, and by believing that it was an important way of 
communication and improvement. 
The events that followed, also in warm demonstrations and protests in 
this newspaper, on the Internet and through statements which, 
unfortunately, have been distorting the truth and scratching the 
institution image, make me do this reflection. Initially, also for 
matters of respect towards our musicians because it is a subject of 
interest only for themselves, we avoided making any public comment. We 
have been open to dialogue in the past few weeks, we have reduced some 
works that made up the evaluation and we have clarified doubts. The 
tone of the demonstration of some musicians, unfortunately, 
demonstrated that the desire was confrontational, contrary to a firm 
purpose of the Foundation to improve the artistic level and turn the 
OSB, in the coming years, again into the best orchestra in the country. 

Little has been said, especially to the general public, that we have 
presented the musicians with a new internal bylaw, with a greater 
demand for work like that of other great orchestras, and a 50% increase 
in earnings, raising the minimum wage to R$ 9000 monthly, which depends 
partly on the number of monthly concerts. We believe those are 
excellent conditions to ensure competitiveness and to attract foreign 
and Brazilian musicians to fill job openings in our orchestra. It is 
also an extraordinary sign for those students, including the 83 members 
of our Young OSB, that the career of an orchestra musician can pay a 
professional in a dignifying manner, which is commensurate with his 
contribution to the orchestral body. 
We have a great orchestra, but it can be even better. The Foundation, 
through its Trustees, has given clear signs that it is expecting this 
development and that it supports the artistic direction. The orchestra 
believes that the artistic direction will drive the process fairly, but 
with high levels of demand. Our statutory role, our duty to the legacy 
we have received, is exactly that, the one of ensuring the future of 
the institution. 
It was never our intention to hurt the respect we have for the 
differentiated work that a musician performs. The evaluations that are 
currently underway are only part of a continuous process of improvement 
and artistic evolution. We totally understand and respect the sacrifice 
of a life devoted to the study of an instrument and aimed at perfection 
every moment. We owe our gratitude to those who for years have been 
contributing to the story of our orchestra. By recalling that we are a 
private institution, I recognize that we had the onus of including all 
the musicians in the evaluations, for we believed it would be the most 
correct way of doing it. 
Let me conclude by bringing a personal testimony. I received from my 
father, Maestro Eleazar de Carvalho, the legacy of a life devoted to 
the craft of music and many years devoted to the OSB. This dream of my 
father was discontinued for negative reasons and beyond his control. I 
was given the responsibility to humbly continue this dream in the 
Presidency of the Brazilian Symphony Orchestra Foundation. The other 
board members, the artistic direction and the managers will never be 
able to fulfill that dream without our musicians. We expect from those 
who share the goal of having a remarkable set, to continue to 
contribute to it. 

 

Finally, this from Augusto Maurer of the Orquestra Sinfônica de Porto Alegre, Brazil:
http://impromptu.opsblog.org/

we at OSPA strongly support the claims of the insurgent members of OSB against the imposed reauditions, concerning not only the human rights and working conditions involved but, ultimately, the progress of the artistic direction of music collectives towards the utmost quality in music making.

If you agree, at least partially, to the above argument, please consider signing the online petition for the immediate suspension of the abusive process of reauditions currently underway at OSB here.

Andre Previn, criticised for refusing to speak about Japan’s humanitarian crisis while touring the US and Canada with the NHK orchestra, has just agreed to donate ‘part of his honorarium’ to aid relief efforts.

The concession was broken in a press statement by orchestra chairman, Naoki Nojima.
Here’s the text:

We
would like to thank people in Canada for their support.


We are all deeply touched by kind words,
thoughts and prayers we are receiving all over the world.


We
were scheduled to depart from Narita airport in Tokyo 20 hrs after the first
earthquake hit us. We were not sure,
first, if we can make it to America
.


We
struggled with the decision of whether we should cancel the tour or not. Most of us have had to leave our families
behind and two of our original members are not here because their homes were
destroyed.

Still at the end, after
having collected 93 members of our orchestra, we decided to forge ahead and come
to America, because we believe music can uplift the heart and strengthen the
spirit.

 

In
this occasion, Maestro Previn will be contributing part of his honorarium to the
Red Cross Japanese Earthquake/Tsunami relief fund.


Before the regular program,
Maestro Previn wish to present Bach’s Air as a tribute to the people of Japan.


Naoki Nojima

The
Chairman of NHK Symphony Orchestra Tokyo

I am posting, without comment, two case histories of musicians who have been hustled out of their jobs by forces beyond their control – which usually means conductor intervention.

The first concerns the orchestra of Glyndebourne on Tour, a freelance ensemble that does outstanding work through the English autumn and winter. Its chief conductor is the promising young Czech, Jakob Hrusa. It should be emphasized that Glyndebourne are following proper procedure and all due forms of consultation. It is a far cry from the Brazil furore.

What follows is a petition that is being circulated among the orchest
ra:

Dear player from last Autumn’s GoT orchestra,

Many of you may have
heard already that George (surname withheld) received a letter in February telling him that he will
no longer be leading the orchestra.

I heard the news on the grapevine
last week, and was concerned that some players might not know and wouldn’t have
a chance to voice any concerns they might have about the handling of the matter.
I am sending this email to as many players as I can just to make sure that
everyone at least has the chance to find out about what has happened.

 I
don’t know all the details of how this has come about. However, it seems to me
that a colleague has been treated badly, and when we are working for such a
prestigious company as Glyndebourne, we should not be so scared of losing our
well-paid work that we are totally unable even to ask polite questions of the
company.

The orchestra committee were approached by some members of last
year’s orchestra in the hope that they might be able to represent the
orchestra’s point of view in a letter to the management at Glyndebourne.
However, having heard differing ideas on how best to present the orchestra’s
opinions, the committee members felt that the reactions of so many disparate
freelance players who aren’t currently working together can’t really be
expressed in a single letter.

Although the letter to George stated that
GoT would be seeking a new leader for the 2011 tour, a member of the committee
told me that assurances have been made that no new leader will be engaged until
George has met with the head of human resources at Glyndebourne. This meeting is
to take place in early April with Steven Naylor and Julia Murray-Logue. I think
it is important that anyone who has anxieties about the situation voices them
before this meeting.

Some years ago, Glyndebourne on Tour introduced
official procedures for dealing with problems within the orchestra, and these
were set out in the orchestra’s booklet, explaining what a player could expect
to happen if his or her playing or behaviour was giving cause for concern.

These steps included initial warnings, meetings with section leaders, a
chance for the player to rectify the problem, a review meeting, and careful
guidelines about what would happen if the problem was unresolved. These
procedures are no longer printed in the tour booklet. Since the guidelines were
introduced, several players have lost their positions in the orchestra after
years of service without these procedures having been followed. George has been
leading the orchestra for twenty years, and has received this letter out of the
blue.

Glyndebourne on Tour receives Arts Council funding, and this use of
taxpayers’ money carries with it high expectations of a company being well
run.

I am not suggesting any kind of rabble-rousing or militant action,
but if you feel strongly about what has happened, please write a letter or email
to one of the following:
–  George, who must be going through a terrible
time, and would value any support. He can also pass on your views at the meeting
in April, if you wish. 
– Someone at Glyndebourne – Gus Christie is the
Executive Chairman, David Pickard is the General Director, Steven Naylor (who
wrote to George) is the Director of Artistic Administration, and Julia
Murray-Logue is head of human resources. The address: Glyndebourne, Near
Ringmer, Lewes, East Sussex. BN8 5UU
– Jakub Hrusa, the Music Director of
GoT.

Your letter can be anonymous, if you prefer, and any correspondence
could be copied to another of these names if appropriate. I understand that
freelance musicians value highly a patch of work such as this tour, and that the
fear of not being asked to play with the orchestra again might make a player
hesitant to speak his or her mind. However, I hope that we might be able to pull
together to persuade the company to treat its orchestral musicians in a more
reasonable way.

     (ends)

Ahoy. Yo-ho, to-ho!

Birgit here. I may not be with you any longer but I am still watching, oh yes.
Some of you may know that when I was around I worked as hard as anyone, hitting all those horrible high notes and trying to look as if I thought Turandot had enough brains to pass a driving test on a donkey.
Somehow, I made a lot of money. I never asked for it. They threw it me, like bouquets. Maybe they couldn’t find anyone to sing so loud and high.
Anyway, I put some of the money into the farm and the rest into a prize. Well, why not? It might encourage others to do some good in this frustrating art.
So what happens? They give my prize to a conductor.

A conductor? A stick on Cuban heels. An anatomical appendage (it’s shorter in Swedish) with ego. A third wheel on a bicycle. An efterthought. 
They gave a million dollars of my hard-earned to Riccardo Muti.
What for? So he can buy himself a new train set? Or the whole of Alitalia? Or a month in a monastery for Signor Berlusconi. 
Why did these ants in pants give a million of my high notes to a man who can’t pass wind without a stick in his hand?
For heaven’s sake, Birgit Nilsson had many faults but she never put up with nonsense from that direction. Did the judges never read what I wrote about Karajan – ‘he was just using us’ – or Solti – ‘too slow’ – or any of the rest of the bigshots?
One of the panel, the British critic Christiansen – a closet Dane? – is a Muti fan. ‘I can scarcely wait to hear him conduct Macbeth at Salzburg this summer,’ he tells Daily Telegraph readers. Well bully for him, but who goes to see Verdi for the fellow who’s beating time? It’s singers that make it happen. The rest is decorative.
They had better watch out, those judges. I may be elsewhere but I can still hurl a thunderbolt and cause damage. These are Birgit’s kronor you are tossing about like confetti. Birgit does not like that. 
She is having coffee with Kirsten this morning. We have time between rehearsals. We will take stock. Be warned. We will, as that nice Mr Mercury suggested the other day at the Celestial Brits, we will rock you.
Oh, yes.
And tell that Muti I want to see receipts.

Ahoy. Yo-ho, to-ho!

Birgit here. I may not be with you any longer but I am still watching, oh yes.
Some of you may know that when I was around I worked as hard as anyone, hitting all those horrible high notes and trying to look as if I thought Turandot had enough brains to pass a driving test on a donkey.
Somehow, I made a lot of money. I never asked for it. They threw it me, like bouquets. Maybe they couldn’t find anyone to sing so loud and high.
Anyway, I put some of the money into the farm and the rest into a prize. Well, why not? It might encourage others to do some good in this frustrating art.
So what happens? They give my prize to a conductor.

A conductor? A stick on Cuban heels. An anatomical appendage (it’s shorter in Swedish) with ego. A third wheel on a bicycle. An efterthought. 
They gave a million dollars of my hard-earned to Riccardo Muti.
What for? So he can buy himself a new train set? Or the whole of Alitalia? Or a month in a monastery for Signor Berlusconi. 
Why did these ants in pants give a million of my high notes to a man who can’t pass wind without a stick in his hand?
For heaven’s sake, Birgit Nilsson had many faults but she never put up with nonsense from that direction. Did the judges never read what I wrote about Karajan – ‘he was just using us’ – or Solti – ‘too slow’ – or any of the rest of the bigshots?
One of the panel, the British critic Christiansen – a closet Dane? – is a Muti fan. ‘I can scarcely wait to hear him conduct Macbeth at Salzburg this summer,’ he tells Daily Telegraph readers. Well bully for him, but who goes to see Verdi for the fellow who’s beating time? It’s singers that make it happen. The rest is decorative.
They had better watch out, those judges. I may be elsewhere but I can still hurl a thunderbolt and cause damage. These are Birgit’s kronor you are tossing about like confetti. Birgit does not like that. 
She is having coffee with Kirsten this morning. We have time between rehearsals. We will take stock. Be warned. We will, as that nice Mr Mercury suggested the other day at the Celestial Brits, we will rock you.
Oh, yes.
And tell that Muti I want to see receipts.

The uncontainable avant-gardist John Zorn will be fronting a benefit concert Sunday week at Columbia University’s Miller Theater on behalf of disaster victims in Japan.

His bill is topped by Yoko Ono and her son Sean Lennon, with chip-ins from Mike Patton and my Mahler mate Uri Caine. Tix for $50 or $100. Some gig. Wish I was there.
Great to see the wilder shores doing their bit while the classical old-timers maintain radio silence. Go raise ’em John Sebastian…. Gustav’s with you, Uri.

press release follows

MILLER THEATRE AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF THE ARTS

presents a benefit concert for Japan

hosted by JOHN ZORN and featuring

SONIC YOUTH, YOKO ONO, SEAN LENNON, CIBO MATTO

with Mike Patton, Mephista, Marc Ribot, Uri Caine, and Zorn’s Aleph Trio

 

100% of proceeds will be donated to support Japan earthquake relief efforts

 

Sunday, March 27, 8:00 PM

 

Tickets: $50, $100 · Students Tickets: $25

 

http://www.millertheatre.com/Events/EventDetails.aspx?nid=1447

Sunday, March 27, 8:00PM

Concert to Benefit Japan Earthquake Relief

 

More than a dozen innovative artists at the intersection of indie rock, contemporary jazz, and avant-garde performance will come together at Miller Theatre to present a benefit concert to support recovery efforts in Japan.  “The tragedy and devastation is really overwhelming,” says John Zorn, who has organized and will host the evening.  “I’ve always felt a strong personal connection to Japan, and I’m just glad to be able to do my part to help.  It should be an amazing night.” 

 

The lineup includes

feature performances by musician and artist Yoko Ono, and her son Sean Lennon; Japanese-American indie duo Cibo Matto; and the influential band Sonic Youth.  Vocalist Mike Patton will appear as a special guest, and MephistaMarc RibotUri Caine, and John Zorn’s Aleph Trio will also play short sets.

 

Both the performers and the theater are donating their services, ensuring that 100% of proceeds from ticket sales will go to benefit the victims of the earthquake and tsunami that hit near Sendai on March 11.  Funds will be donated to the Japan Society’s Earthquake Relief Fund.

 

ARTISTS:   Sonic Youth  

                     Yoko Ono

Sean Lennon

Cibo Matto (Yuka Honda & Miho Hatori)

Mike Patton, vocals

Mephista (Susie Ibarra, drums; Sylvie Courvoisier, piano; Ikue Mori, electronics)

Marc Ribot, guitar

Uri Caine, piano

Aleph Trio (John Zorn, saxophone; Trevor Dunn, bass; Kenny Wollesen, drums)