Ruth Leon recommends…Love’s Labour’s Won – Royal Shakespeare Company
Ruth Leon recommendsLove’s Labour’s Won – Royal Shakespeare Company
Click here for tickets: subscription tv
Love’s Labour’s Won is famously listed as one of Shakespeare’s ‘lost plays’. However, it is not lost, nor has it ever been, it is just an alternate name for another play, in the way that Twelfth Night is also called What You Will. In fact, Love’s Labour’s Won is no less than the much-beloved, and definitely not lost, Much Ado About Nothing.
For the Royal Shakespeare Company’s 2014 production, starring Michelle Terry (now Artistic Director of Shakespeare’s Globe) and Edward Bennett as the warring lovers, Beatrice and Benedick, the director Christopher Luscombe set it at the end of the First World War.
Autumn 1918. A group of soldiers returns from the trenches. The world weary Benedick and his friend Claudio get reacquainted with Beatrice and Hero. As memories of conflict give way to a life of parties and masked balls, Claudio and Hero fall madly, deeply in love, while Benedick and Beatrice reignite their own rather more combative courtship.
Simon Higlett’s set was designed to resemble Charlecote Park, a Tudor estate near Stratford that Shakespeare would certainly have known. In fact, there’s a report that as a boy he was caught poaching in the grounds. The Edwardian period is particularly fitting for the aftermath of war that Shakespeare describes, young men returning, exhausted and battered, and trying to regain their pre-war insouciance while grasping at the possibility of a settled future.
Shakespeare’s comic romance plays out amidst the brittle high spirits of a post-war house party, as youthful passions run riot, lovers are deceived and happiness is threatened – before peace ultimately wins out.
“Loves Labours Wonne” is not MAAN, but the earlier version of “All’s Well That End’s Well” that was sold off for publication once the revised version was performed.
Well worth seeing
“Love’s Labour’s Won” is mentioned by Francis Meres in 1598, and Much Ado had probably not yet been written. Much Ado dates to 1598 or 1599.
Some people think it’s an alternate title for Taming of the Shrew, since Shrew is the only play that had been written that Meres doesn’t mention.
I think it’s a lost play, simply because the end of Love’s Labours Lost certainly seems like there must be a sequel.