Met tenor ‘attacked stranger on subway’

The New York tenor John Easterlin has been chrged with third-degree assault, following an incident on the subway station at Broadway and West 50th. Easterlin, who has sung comprimario roles at the Met since 2004, is alleged to have approached a woman of 35 and punched her in the ribs.

Neither side has commented.

Easterlin, 57, has also sung at Covent Garden, Vienna, Madrid and the Bolshoi.

 

 

 

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
  • These alleged incidents and accusations should really not be published, especially regarding incidents such as this one. I myself experienced something similar from a crazy old lady in New York in January. It was during the hard freeze where temperatures were around -20 (!) and as I was boarding a city bus, the lady in front of me got paranoid about me being so close to her as I was boarding. She pushed me off the bus, and then told the bus driver that I had assaulted her. The bus driver was obliged to call the police, and I am lucky that this got dismissed and that I didn’t end up with the story here in SlippeDisc!

    • Slipped Disc is summarizing a NY Post article whose reporting is based on a police report. If you look at the original article, the reporter reached out to both sides for comment and got no response (as indicated above). The reporter did his diligence by asking the tenor for comment. I don’t see any problems with the way this is presented.

      • In a forum where 1) English is not the first language for many commenters and 2) there is not an easy way to edit comments once they are submitted, correction by other commenters of typos or minor grammatical errors is really not necessary and just comes across as pedantic. You’re not adding anything meaningful to the conversation. I am a writer and editor — that’s how I make my living — and really, the little errors are OK. In fact, I am grateful for a diverse community and if everyone’s English is not perfect, it’s OK.

        In fact, if you really want to nit-pick, the phrase should be hyphenated as “highly-strung.” Those who correct grammar should be sure to be … correct. 🙂

        • …except that, unless there is a likelihood of ambiguity or misreading, adverb-plus-adjective/participle compounds with an adverb ending in -ly are not hyphenated (reasonably small, fully occupied, highly strung). 🙂

          • Without a hyphen, the “highly” in “highly strung” sounds/looks like it means “very” (as in “highly doubtful”). Just sayin (no g).

            For what it’s worth (not much), I learned the expression as “high-strung,” kind of like “tight-assed.” 😉

        • “there is not an easy way to edit comments once they are submitted”

          I love edit-wars!

          (If thumbs-down > 10, please change “love” to “hate”.)

      • It is correct to say:

        “High-strung” belongs to common class of compound adjectives, often hyphenated, that does not merit this high-handed, high-minded debate with high sounding and high faluting words in a high flown grammatical discussion.

        However, it is *incorrectly to say:

        “*Highly strung” belongs to common class of compound adjectives, often hyphenated, that does not merit this *highly handed, *highly minded debate with *highly sounding and *highly faluting words in a *highly flown grammatical discussion.

    • Your comment reminds me of Ingmar Bergman (from his notebooks): “My play starts with the actor going down to the salon and strangling a critic and reading from a small black book everything he has written in humiliation. Then he vomits on the public. Then he goes out and shoots a bullet in his head.”

  • Oh, for Chrissakes. It’s only hyphenated if preceding the noun, not in the predicate. To be technical. And correct.

  • As an alleged incident, where “neither side has commented”, I’m not sure how this has managed to make it past the editor? Is this really the standard of journalism on here? It is careers and reputations you are playing with here. ‘Slipped Disc’, – the shoddy tabloid of classical music journalism…

  • Slipped Disc is merely summarizing a NY Post article whose reporting is based on a police report. If you look at the original article, the reporter reached out to both sides for comment and got no response (as indicated above). The reporter did his diligence by asking the tenor for comment.

  • The case has so nothing to do with music that I wonder why Norman bothered to put it on SD….oh wait, music isn’t what SD is about, is it? Even if it was, the word ‘alleged’ should have precluded its inclusion here. Anything else of interest going on in the world of music?

  • How about updating the story with the facts that the case was thrown out with no charges filed? Unfair to the accused who DID NOT commit a crime.

  • >