Yannick attacks Sibelius

Yannick Nézet-Séguin and the Orchestre Métropolitain de Montréal have begun recording the symphonies of Jean Sibelius.

You don’t often see him in a winter jacket.

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
    • Not with the Orchestre Métropolitain. Not sure what exactly the deal is, but he’s consistently recorded on Atma (including a Bruckner complete symphonies cycle).

      As for this CD, it came out about 3 months ago…

    • I thought so too, but if you download the booklet to this CD you can see that he’s done a complete Bruckner cycle and seven other recordings with Orchestre Métropolitain on ATMA. Maybe it’s a deal with the orchestra.

  • The Metropolitan Orchestra website says: “Yannick Nézet-Séguin records exclusively for the famous yellow Deutsche Grammophon label while also maintaining a collaborative partnership between ATMA Classique and the Orchestre Métropolitain.” Clear as mud!

    He has made many recordings for ATMA including all of the Bruckner Symphonies. EuroArts is about to release a video of him conducting the Rotterdam Philharmonic playing Shostokovich’s 4th Symphony.

    • That Shostakovich 4th is in the 6 disc DG box set with N.-S./Rotterdam Phil. It’s outstanding. So too is the Mahler 10 (Cooke) and there’s a very, very good Bruckner 8 as well. Everything in that box set is good. I highly recommend it. I own many recordings of the Shosty 4th, and this one is as good as any of the other ones (Rostroprovich/NSO, Kondrashin, Previn/CSO, Jansons/BRSO, etc.)


  • It makes sense because not long ago Sibelius was considered the most popular of all composers. (But not by the people who spin records for public, classical stations who generally disdain the public).

    I think his 5th symphony is better than the one by the
    B guy; and also better than Mahler’s 5th. I also think Bernstein’s VPO recording of the 5th is hard to beat.

    • There’s room in the world for all music. Just choose what you like and leave the rest alone for others to enjoy.

    • Fine, whatever. Sibelius 5 is a wonder (but I’ll submit that so is Beethoven 5).

      But your comment brings to mind a 1940’s murder mystery (pretty sure it’s “Laura”), where the detective blows a hole in somebody’s alibi using Sibelius. It goes something like:

      Q: Where were you the night of the murder?
      A: I told you already, I was at the Philharmonic concert.
      Q: And what did they play that night?
      A: I told you that, too. Mozart and Beethoven [or whatever]. (Produces program for detective to peruse)
      Q: Ha! You’re lying! In fact, they scrapped this program at the last minute and played all Sibelius!

      I don’t think this gives away who the killer was — as I recall, there were several people with fake alibis. Pretty good movie though, if you like 1940’s film noir.

      • It IS a good film, except that the idea of Clifton Webb as the lover of Gene Tierney was pretty hilarious. And Vincent Price, for that matter!! They really had zero idea about casting, it seems.

        • Hi Sue,
          I agree with you about Webb.
          But Vincent Price: classic! He often said that Laura was his favorite film (to appear in).

  • Which idiot designer did the front cover?

    What does “1” mean? Volume 1? Symphony 1 (short measure, if so)? Sibelius’s dad?

  • Most worrying is surely the (apparent) lack of coupling. It was a bit rich of DG to issue Bernstein’s VPO version in 1990 without a coupling – and that was nearly 30 years ago… Unless this version gets rave reviews I’m unlikely to acquire it.

      • Mathias, I agree, so as it happens that justified the cost of the disc – that plus the obviating circumstances that LB wasn’t in a position to have recorded any coupling.

      • For some reason, Y N-S appears to have joined the NL/SD hit list. This superb musician has consistently been condescended to, at the very least around here; at the very least he seems to be getting lumped in with Dudamel, another target, also rather unfairly. I think Yannick is the superior musician, but do not hear enough of Dudamel to really comment these days — when I saw him he was very young and still a “potential” (which may or may not have been realised, though good orchestras continue to engage him and good artists to perform with him.

        Anyway, when an artist hits the SD skids, language is carefully used to undermine his reputation. Judging by some of the comments above, it may not be quite so enthusiastically embraced by the readership this time.

  • If this new recording is anything like his dreadful Schumann or Bruckner, you might say “butchers” instead of “attacks”.

  • what a bore.only no 2 & 5 are of any worth.and they’ve been recorded endless times.who cares about another.

  • Brave orchestra, but no charm, last note of the recording bit odd….. This cycle probably not a first choice nor a second…just like the Bruckner….One probably has a good time with his live concerts, but the recordings are so unnecessary, never wanted to hear them twice……

  • >