Why is the US Air Force buying a $75,000 Gagliano cello?

According to Time magazine:

‘The Defense Department posted a solicitation for a cello on Tuesday, saying it would be conducting an “online competitive reverse auction” to ensure taxpayers get the best price. …

‘An uunnamed Air Force official … specifies that it must be a cello “crafted by Joannes Gagliano 1787” … Captain Derek White, an Air Force spokesman, said procurement rules cap this particular purchase at $150,000. The final price, he added Thursday, will likely be around $75,000.’

Can anyone make sense of this?

air force cello

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
  • The US government is required to adhere to an open bidding procedure for items above a certain threshold. I imagine that a musician in one of the military orchestras needed a cello, tried a bunch, and found one he liked. Now the government has to specify exactly what it is to be bought and allow other bidders for the sale to have a chance to offer exactly the same thing (which won’t happen) at a lower price.

  • Perhaps I misunderstood the question. It was really, why does a military musician need an expensive instrument, I guess. In that case, I speculate that sounding good is the reason and, in my opinion, that is money better spent than on, say, $20,000 toilet seats or another redundant battleship.

    • These are tremendously gifted musicians performing an important duty. They deserve the proper tools for their job.

    • I’m happier to see the money go to cellos than to missile systems or whatever, but the statistic that jumped out at me was that the annual budget for military music is THREE TIMES that of the National Endowment for the Arts. That is ridiculous.

  • The curiosity is the use of an open bidding arrangement for an item specified so narrowly that there are unlikely to be any alternative bids. Other Gagliano cellos there will be, some may actually be for sale, but other Gaglianos from 1787 also for sale at the moment would be quite surprising.

    Curious also that they say a price up to 150k is allowed, but they expect 75k, presumably because that price has been agreed already. But what would they do if the seller decides to insist on 149k ? The goods meets the exact specification, and is within the price range.

    Really just an example of how a commercial process (for buying commodity items where competitve prices for interchangeable items can be established) can be required in an inappropriate setting, and how the the administrators are willing to distort the process rather than point out that it is the wrong one.

    Sniping aside, I hope the player enjoys the Gagliano, and that audiences notice a difference.

  • >