Midnight treat: Rachmaninov plays Schubert

A perfect end to the festivities.

rachmaninov piano

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
    • A cantabile like Cortot, double notes like Lhevinne, and a Beethoven Op 111 that was said to have left a profound impression on Schnabel no less. The greatest of them all.

  • Amazing thing about this is that in spite of all the rubato–some of it pretty extreme for current ears, there yet remains a very consistent pulse. You rarely hear anything this romanticized played “in time” and in such good taste This is an astounding performance! (Hope Milka gets to hear it.)

  • I’ve left word that as I lay dying I want the Horowitz version (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohtikwa64xo) played via terrific earphones so it’ll be the last sounds I hear. That said, you’d hardly go wrong with Murray Perahia’s version (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1vlTbEPWvY) either.

    I often wondered just why Horowitz decided to add this to his recorded repertoire and now wonder, having just learned about the Rachmaninov, if he wasn’t just trying to emulate, compete with, better, his friend.

    It’s been a while since I listened to the VH recording, but recall that over good earphones one could hear him exhale a sigh (contentment?) as the last note faded away.

    They’re all great arrangements — and it’s Schubert, too!

  • I cannot thank you enough for this recording. I am currently putting the finishing touches to my new lecture/workshop and this depicts so precisely what I am attempting to show young pianists (musicians generally), we have moved away from the freedom of the ‘romantic’ movement and put everything into rigid little boxes. It’s not true that no one alive comes near to this, but they are few and far between and often dismissed as sentimental fools. I will be using this as a wonderful example!

    • As lovely as this may sound to many ,it is a great mistake to imagine that this is what
      Schubert imagined or heard in his mind …the instruments of his day sounded nothing like
      this piano, the sensibilities of the age (1800) are not ours …he may have
      liked this rendition or may have abhorred it . It is an interpretation and a piano 100 years after the fact and to make the playing of a Rachmaninov or a Paderewski etc. the
      standard to go by is a mistake . I heard a Chopin recital played on one of his pianos and it
      was a revelation, I suspect it would give Chopin prize winners collective heart failure to
      hear what one can only imagine the audience of his day heard at his concerts .

      • Your points are not exactly hard news. Of COURSE Schubert’s piano was different, and we have no idea what he would have thought of SR’s playing, which is something like a beautiful “translation” from one era to another. Jussi Bjorling sang it “all wrong” too, but it was beautiful. It must be difficult not to be able to enjoy the beautiful.

  • Absolutely beautiful. Loved every note! I have an LP with Gigli singing this which I never got tired of hearing. This arrangement captures the same magic for me.
    Thank you so much Norman.

  • >