Exclusive: La Scala lifts its ban on newspaper critic

The denial of access by Opera Australia to two prominent critics has sparked discussion the world over on the nature of the relationship between a state-funded opera house and a vigorous free media.

Valerio Tura, former artistic director of La Monnaie, think there should be a cordon sanitaire between the two sides. He writes to Slipped Disc:

In the best of possible worlds, critics (music, theatre, cinema, arts exhibitions, pop, rock, etc.) should have tickets paid for by their papers, and perhaps attend the shows incognito, as Michelin guide writers are supposed to do when they review a restaurant, paying their bills.

In the best of possible worlds, critics should be paid enough by their papers so that they are not forced, nor induced to accept jobs from arts organisations.
In the best of possible worlds, critics should not write program notes for a fee.
In the best of possible worlds, fashion writers, when they travel for covering a défilé, should not accept five stars hotels, top restaurants dinners, and perhaps gifts-in-kind and sex-dating with young “mannequins” (yes, I am told that this happens…!) from fashion firms…
In the best of possible worlds, soccer writers should have their tickets at the stadium paid for by their papers…
In the best of possible worlds travel & leisure writers should not accept vacations paid for by tour operators…
In the best of possible worlds art critics should not accept artworks as gifts-in-kind from young and promising painters or sculptors…
In the best of possible worlds…

However, we do not live in the best of possible worlds. We live in a world where a degree of compromise is the norm. The issue is to what extent the compromise is acceptable and sustainable. My answer is: up to the point where the deal is reasonable, mutually accepted, and – most important of all – declared.

And, I’m afraid, when the deal is broken, the organisation (opera house, tour operator, fashion designer, restaurant) has the right to refuse favours.

 

isotta-244618

Some time ago the Teatro alla Scala started refusing complimentary tickets to Paolo Isotta, music critic of the very important Milan-based newspaper Corriere della Sera, who was evidently following his own agenda of bashing Scala policy in every way. I have not always been a fan of Stéphane Lissner, the Scala intendant, nor did I always find his artistic policy good, but in that case I thought that he was totally right.

The bottom line is that completely independent journalism is a utopia. A degree of manipulation has always existed. And will continue to do so.

The bottom line is that George Orwell’s maxim, quoted by Deborah Jones – ‘Journalism is what people don’t want to see printed, all the rest is advertising’ – is still valid.

We contacted La Scala today to clarify the position. A spokesman for the company says it stands by its past decision to refuse tickets to Isotta, who (among other vituperations) had written that Claudio Abbado was not a proper conductor and that another guest conductor had made Wagner sound homosexual. After a public exchange of letters between Lissner for La Scala and the Corriere editor in February 2013, the newspaper decided that it would refuse free tickets in future, paying itself for any critics or writers who attended any theatre. The newspaper maintains that practice up to now.

However, La Scala’s new administration, led by Alexander Pereira and Riccardo Chailly, told Slipped Disc today that, in future, no-one will be considered persona non grata at the theatre. That includes Paolo Isotta. He is welcome to request free tickets.

This seems, to us, a reasoned and sustainable position. 

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
  • Rudolph Tang says:

    Shall I compile a list of music journalists in China who have been or still are denied press tickets to some of the most powerful music institutions in China including the National Centre for the Performing Arts, the Beijing Music Festival and the Shanghai Symphony Orchestra, for telling the truth?

  • Pirkko says:

    I don’t know how homosexual music sounds. I don’t know either how does music sound heterosexual. Isn’t it about time some good enough music critic told us what makes music sound for example bisexual?

  • Anonymous says:

    As opera houses spend tens of thousands yearly on advertising in print media (if not a lot more), then it is not unreasonable for newspapers to pay for their own tickets.

    The point is that opera companies, deep down, expect to be given an easier ride in return for free tickets and personal service.

    However, in the case of Opera Australia, the article in question seemed so blinkered from the real world as to be wilfully perverse. No opera house operating in a difficult economy is going to put on works that are not bankable.

    A symbiotic relationship has developed between critics and directors. An average review now contains a single paragraph on the quality of the singing. The rest is devoted to the production. Long rehearsal periods drain an opera house’s resources and a production that does not serve the work or the singers does not have longevity. Singing is hard. Singing whilst contorting oneself is harder still. As Robert Merrill once reportedly said to a young director, ‘Son, I sing or I act. I don’t do the two at the same time’.

    I once heard a major house intendant beg a group of agents to convince the directors on their roster to cut rehearsal time. It was having a highly detrimental effect on the running of his house. Revivals at Covent Garden used to have two weeks of rehearsal. New productions got three and a half weeks. And no-one complained about the quality of what was on stage…

  • Dave T says:

    What sane person in their right mind would bother reading, let alone trusting, a critic who has been bribed by the subject he/she is covering with free tickets, meals, this, that, or the other?

  • >