PayPal and the destroyed violin: 'we're looking into it' (update)

After being derided in media, old and new, for its instruction to a customer to destroy a  precious violin before a dispute could be resolved, PayPal has buried its head in a bunker in the hope the storm will subside.

‘We’re looking into it,‘ bleated a flunkey. That’s all. Nothing from Lord Birt, who was lput on the board to deal with such stuff (is he still there?). How long does it take to verify the claim? Maybe they’ll adopt Virgin’s larcenous 30-day wait.

But by the time they’re done, the humanoid banking site will be a global laughing stock.

UPDATE: A second statement to the Guardian this morning adds no clarity or regret – just more flannel:

A spokesperson for PayPal said: “While we cannot talk about this particular case due to PayPal’s privacy policy, we carefully review each case, and in general we may ask a buyer to destroy counterfeit goods if they supply signed evidence from a knowledgeable third party that the goods are indeed counterfeit. The reason why we reserve the option to ask the buyer to destroy the goods is that in many countries, including the US, it is a criminal offence to mail counterfeit goods back to a seller.”

share this

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on google
  • Well, they’ve done one thing well… they’ve successfully made themselves look worse.

    How are they going to authenticate the claim without the violin????? I don’t get this policy at all. Destroy a product before the claim is examined?

  • THe policy makes sense. However, as someone mentioned on the former post, there is nothing as a counterfeit violin…

    Plus, try to authenticate a violin through Skype…

  • >